...
首页> 外文期刊>LASER THERAPY >Prospective Comparison Study of 532/1064 nm Picosecond Laser vs 532/1064 nm Nanosecond Laser in the Treatment of Professional Tattoos in Asians
【24h】

Prospective Comparison Study of 532/1064 nm Picosecond Laser vs 532/1064 nm Nanosecond Laser in the Treatment of Professional Tattoos in Asians

机译:532/1064 nmPic秒激光与532/1064 nm纳秒激光治疗亚洲人专业纹身的前瞻性比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Aims: Although, the pulse width should be shorter than the thermal relaxation time of the target, nanosecond laser pulses are not short enough for tattoo removal. Complications are common, such as hyper or hypopigmentation, textural changes, and scarring. Moreover, patients with darker skin types are at a higher risk of complications from tattoo removal using these lasers. Picosecond lasers were developed to overcome the limitation of nanosecond lasers. We did a comparison study of a 532/1064 nm picosecond laser vs a 532/1064 nm nanosecond laser to evaluate the clinical efficacy and complications of multi-color tattoos in Asians.Materials and Methods: Eleven Asian patients with 37 professional tattoos were enrolled in the study. Each patient was treated with a 532/1064 nm nanosecond laser and a 532/1064 nm picosecond laser. The spot size that was used with each laser was 3 mm. Four treatments were performed, with four week intervals between each treatment. Patients were examined a week after the first treatment and 3 months after the last treatment.Results and Conclusions: All patients tolerated the treatments well. The efficacy of the 1064 nm picosecond laser for black tattoos is significantly better than the other studied lasers. The efficacy of the 532 nm picosecond laser is significantly better than the other studied lasers for red tattoos. The efficacy of the 532 nm picosecond laser is significantly better than the 532 nm nanosecond laser and better than the 1064 nm picosecond laser for green tattoos. Mild to moderate post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation was observed in 35.1%, 24.3% 27.0%, and 21.6% of the tattoos treated with the 532 nm nanosecond laser, the 532 nm picosecond laser, the 1064 nm nanosecond laser, and the 1064 nm pico-second laser, respectively. Paradoxical darkening (5.4%) was observed equally with each type of laser. There was no scar formation in any of the tattoos treated. The 532/1064 nm picosecond laser is more effective than the 532/1064 nm nanosecond laser in the treatment of multi-color tattoos in Asians. The 532 nm picosecond laser is more effective than 1064 nm picosecond laser in every tattoo color, with the exception of black. Paradoxical darkening was observed, even the use of picosecond lasers.
机译:背景和目标:虽然,脉冲宽度应短于目标的热弛豫时间,但纳秒激光脉冲不足以足够短,以便纹身移除。并发症是常见的,例如超级或低分成,纹理变化和疤痕。此外,皮肤较深的患者患有这些激光器的纹身清除的患者风险较高。开发了PICOSECOND激光器以克服纳秒激光器的限制。我们做了对532/1064 nm皮秒激光的比较研究,532/1064 nm纳秒激光,评估亚洲人的多色纹身的临床疗效和并发症。材料和方法:11名亚洲患者37名专业纹身患者在研究中注册。每位患者用532/1064nm纳秒激光和532/1064nm picosecond激光处理。与每个激光器一起使用的光斑尺寸为3毫米。进行四种处理,每次治疗之间有四周间隔。在第一次治疗后一周和最后一次治疗后3个月检查患者。结果和结论:所有患者均耐受治疗良好。用于黑色纹身的1064 nm Picosecond激光器的功效明显优于其他研究的激光器。 532 nm picosecond激光器的功效明显优于红色纹身的其他研究激光器。 532 nmpic秒激光的功效明显优于532nm纳秒激光,而优于绿色纹身的1064 nm picosecond激光器。在35.1%,24.3%27.0%和21.6%用532nm纳秒激光器,532nm picosecond激光器,1064nm纳秒激光器和1064nm pico-(1064nm pico)处理的35.1%,24.3%27.0%和21.6%的纹身葡萄花肌瘤中的21.6%。第二激光。用每种类型的激光同等地观察到矛盾的变暗(5.4%)。任何纹身都没有疤痕形成。 532/1064 NMPic秒激光比532/1064nm纳秒激光在亚洲人的多色纹身处理中更有效。在每个纹身颜色中,532 nm picosecond激光器比每种纹身颜色更有效,除黑色外。观察到矛盾的变暗,甚至使用皮秒激光器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号