首页> 外文期刊>Modern Pathology >'Interchangeability' of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy
【24h】

'Interchangeability' of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy

机译:PD-L1免疫组织化学分析的“互换性”:诊断准确性的荟萃分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Different clones, protocol conditions, instruments, and scoring/readout methods may pose challenges in introducing different PD-L1 assays for immunotherapy. The diagnostic accuracy of using different PD-L1 assays interchangeably for various purposes is unknown. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to address PD-L1 assay interchangeability based on assay diagnostic accuracy for established clinical uses/purposes. A systematic search of the MEDLINE database using PubMed platform was conducted using "PD-L1" as a search term for 01/01/2015 to 31/08/2018, with limitations "English" and "human". 2,515 abstracts were reviewed to select for original contributions only. 57 studies on comparison of two or more PD-L1 assays were fully reviewed. 22 publications were selected for meta-analysis. Additional data were requested from authors of 20/22 studies in order to enable the meta-analysis. Modified GRADE and QUADAS-2 criteria were used for grading published evidence and designing data abstraction templates for extraction by reviewers. PRISMA was used to guide reporting of systematic review and meta-analysis and STARD 2015 for reporting diagnostic accuracy study. CLSI EP12-A2 was used to guide test comparisons. Data were pooled using random-effects model. The main outcome measure was diagnostic accuracy of various PD-L1 assays. The 22 included studies provided 376 22 contingency tables for analyses. Results of our study suggest that, when the testing laboratory is not able to use an Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic(s) for PD-L1 assessment for its specific clinical purpose(s), it is better to develop a properly validated laboratory developed test for the same purpose(s) as the original PD-L1 Food and Drug Administration-approved immunohistochemistry companion diagnostic, than to replace the original PD-L1 Food and Drug Administration-approved immunohistochemistry companion diagnostic with a another PD-L1 Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic that was developed for a different purpose.
机译:不同的克隆,协议条件,仪器和得分/读数方法可能会对引入不同的PD-L1测定​​来造成挑战以进行免疫疗法。使用不同PD-L1测定​​的诊断精度可互换地用于各种目的是未知的。该荟萃分析的主要目的是根据确定临床用/目的的测定诊断精度来解决PD-L1测定​​互换性。使用PubMed平台进行系统搜索使用PubMed平台的“PD-L1”作为搜索字词,以01/01/2015到2015年01/08/2018,具有限制“英语”和“人类”。审查了2,515篇摘要,仅供原始贡献选择。 57对两种或更多种或更多PD-L1测定​​进行比较的研究进行了完全审查。选择了22种出版物进行荟萃分析。从20/22研究的作者请求其他数据,以便能够进行Meta分析。修改的级和Quadas-2标准用于分级公开的证据和设计数据抽象模板,供审阅者提取。 PRISMA用于指导报告系统审查和META分析和Stard 2015,以报告诊断准确性研究。 CLSI EP12-A2用于指导测试比较。使用随机效果模型汇集数据。主要结果测量是各种PD-L1测定​​的诊断准确性。第22项研究提供了376个22个应急表进行分析。我们的研究结果表明,当测试实验室无法使用食品和药物管理批准的伴随诊断,对于其特定的临床目的,最好制定适当的验证实验室开发了与原始PD-L1食品和药物管理局批准的免疫组化伴侣诊断的实验室测试,比取代原始的PD-L1食品和药物管理局批准的免疫组化伴侣诊断为另一个PD-L1食物和药物管理局批准的伴侣诊断,用于不同的目的。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号