...
首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology Research >Comparative Effectiveness of Ustekinumab Versus Adalimumab in Induction of Clinical Response and Remission in Crohn’s Disease: Experience of a Real-World Cohort at a Tertiary Care Inflammatory Bowel Disease Referral Center
【24h】

Comparative Effectiveness of Ustekinumab Versus Adalimumab in Induction of Clinical Response and Remission in Crohn’s Disease: Experience of a Real-World Cohort at a Tertiary Care Inflammatory Bowel Disease Referral Center

机译:Ustekukumab对克罗恩病临床反应和缓解诱导临床反应和缓解的比较有效性:在高等护理炎症肠病推荐中心的现实世界队列的经验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:There is paucity of head-to-head studies comparing the effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) and adalimumab (ADA) in Crohn's disease (CD). Here we provide a real-world comparison of these two agents.Methods:We conducted an ambidirectional cohort study. Each patient included had moderate to severe active CD. Clinical response and remission were assessed between 4 and 16 weeks after induction.Results:Of a total of 163 patients, 97 were induced with ADA and 66 were induced with UST. Logistic regression model analysis adjusted based on effect size showed that ADA when compared to UST induced clinical response (73.2% vs. 50% (odds ratio (OR): 2.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14 - 5.07; P = 0.02)) and remission (44.3% vs. 27.7% (OR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.07 - 5.16; P = 0.034) in a statistically significantly higher proportion of patients. Among tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-naive patients, when comparing ADA vs. UST, ADA was superior in inducing clinical response (69/89 (77.5%) vs. 4/10 (40%) (OR: 4.26; 95% CI: 1.08 - 16.84; P = 0.04)), but not remission (41/89 (46%) vs. 3/9 (33%) (OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 0.39 - 6.97; P = 0.503)). Among TNF-experienced patients, ADA was numerically inferior in inducing clinical response (2/8 (25%) vs. 29/56 (52%) (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.07 - 1.94; P = 0.24)) and remission (2/8 (25%) vs. 15/56 (27%) (OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.22 - 6.81; P = 0.82)), but neither of these differences were statistically significant.Conclusions:In a real-world setting, the rate of clinical response and remission was higher among patients with CD who received ADA compared to UST. Of note, however, despite the small sample sizes of TNF-experienced patients who received ADA and TNF-naive patients who received UST, the higher effectiveness of ADA in inducing clinical response and indeed remission among patients with CD with active disease appears to primarily be driven by those who are TNF-naive. Among TNF-experienced patients, UST may be superior in inducing clinical response and equally effective in inducing clinical remission when compared to ADA. Based on this study, one may infer that among TNF-experienced patients with CD with active disease, one could consider switching to an agent such as UST instead of a second approved TNF blocker. However, larger studies comparing the two agents are required.Copyright 2019, Ahmed et al.
机译:背景:缺乏头脑研究的缺乏比较Ustekinumab(UST)和Adaalimalab(ADA)在Crohn病(CD)中的有效性。在这里,我们提供了对这两个代理商的真实比较。方法:我们进行了一个Ambidirectional Cohort研究。包括的每位患者都有中度至严重的活性CD。在感应后4至16周之间评估临床反应和缓解。结果:共有163名患者,用ADA和UST诱导97例。基于效果大小调整的逻辑回归模型分析显示,与UST诱导的临床反应相比,ADA(73.2%与50%(或):2.40; 95%置信区间(CI):1.14 - 5.07; P = 0.02 ))和缓解(44.3%与27.7%(或:2.35; 95%CI:1.07 - 5.16; p = 0.034),患者比例比例比例。在肿瘤坏死因子(TNF) - 患者中,比较ADA与UST,ADA优异诱导临床反应(69/89(77.5%)与4/10(40%)(或:4.26; 95%CI:1.08 - 16.84; P = 0.04)),但不是缓解(41/89(46%)与3/9(33%)(或:1.64; 95%CI:0.39-6.97; P = 0.503))。在TNF经验丰富的患者中,ADA在诱导临床时在数值下劣等反应(2/8(25%)与29/56(52%)(或:0.38; 95%CI:0.07 - 1.94; p = 0.24))和缓解(2/8(25%)与15 / 56(27%)(或:1.22; 95%CI:0.22 - 6.81; p = 0.82)),但这些差异都没有统计学意义。链接:在真实世界的环境中,与UST相比,CD的CD患者中临床反应和缓解率较高。然而,虽然,但是,尽管接受了接受了ADA和TNF-naivive患者的TNF经验丰富的患者的小型样本尺寸,但ADA在诱导临床反应和具有活跃疾病的患者中患者患者的患者的效果较高似乎主要是由那些tnf-naive的人推动。在TNF经验丰富的患者中,在与ADA相比,UST在诱导临床反应和同样有效地诱导临床缓解方面可能是优异的。基于本研究,可以推断出在TNF经验丰富的镉患者中,可以考虑切换到诸如UST的代理而不是第二批准的TNF阻滞剂。然而,需要比较两种代理的更大的研究。奥赫迈尔·艾哈迈德等人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号