...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Dentistry >Fracture Toughness Comparison of Three Indirect Composite Resins Using 4-Point Flexural Strength Method
【24h】

Fracture Toughness Comparison of Three Indirect Composite Resins Using 4-Point Flexural Strength Method

机译:使用4点弯曲强度法比较三个间接复合树脂的断裂韧性

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives?The advantages of indirect composite restorations such as less crack formation during their computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing process, compared with ceramic restorations, have resulted in their growing popularity. However, restoration failure is a major concern with regard to the long-term clinical success of restorations and may occur as the result of propagation of a crack originated from an internal flaw in the restoration. This study aimed to compare the fracture toughness of three indirect composite resins. Materials and Methods In this in vitro experimental study, 10 specimens measuring 3 × 3 × 18 mm were fabricated of Gradia, Crios, and high impact polymer composite indirect composites. A single edge notch with a diameter 0.3 mm and 0.3 mm length was created in the 9 mm longitudinal dimension of specimens using a no. 11 surgical scalpel. The specimens were then subjected to 4-point flexural strength test in a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.1 mm/s until failure. Statistical Analysis?Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s HSD (honestly significant difference) test. The statistical power was set at p ? 0.05. Results?One-way ANOVA showed a significant difference in fracture toughness of the three composite groups (p = 0.000). According to the Tukey HSD analysis, the fracture toughness of HIPC was significantly higher than that of the other two composites. The fracture toughness of Gradia was significantly lower among all. Conclusions?Within the limitations of this study, the results showed that high temperature-pressure polymerization can increase resistance to crack propagation and subsequently improve the clinical service of indirect composite restorations. Although we do not know the filler volume percentage of HIPC, it seems that filler volume percentage of the composite is inversely correlated with fracture toughness.
机译:目标?与陶瓷修复体相比,间接复合修复的间接复合修复诸如较少的裂缝形成,如陶瓷修复物相比,导致其日益普及。然而,恢复失败是关于修复的长期临床成功的主要问题,并且由于源于恢复中的内部缺陷的裂缝的繁殖而可能发生。该研究旨在比较三种间接复合树脂的断裂韧性。在这种体外实验研究中的材料和方法,由毕因,CRIOS和高冲击聚合物复合间接组织制造了10个测量3×3×18mm的10个样品。在使用NO的9mm的标本的纵向尺寸中产生具有直径<0.3mm和0.3mm长度的单个边缘凹口。 11个外科手术刀。然后将标本在通用试验机中进行4点弯曲强度试验,十字头速度为0.1mm / s直到失效。统计分析?使用IBM SPSS统计数据通过单向分析(ANOVA)和Tukey的HSD(诚实显着差异)测试来分析数据。统计力量设定为p? 0.05。结果?单向ANOVA显示出三个复合基团的断裂韧性的显着差异(P = 0.000)。根据Tukey HSD分析,HIPC的断裂韧性显着高于其他两种复合材料的骨折韧性。毕业生的裂缝韧性在全部间较低。结论?在本研究的局限内,结果表明,高温 - 压力聚合可以增加抗裂化抗性的抗性,随后改善间接复合修复体的临床服务。虽然我们不知道HIPC的填充体积百分比,但似乎复合材料的填充体积百分比与断裂韧性相反。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号