首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology >Study to compare the effectiveness of intravaginal misoprostol alone with combined use of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical foley’s catheter for termination of mid trimester pregnancy
【24h】

Study to compare the effectiveness of intravaginal misoprostol alone with combined use of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical foley’s catheter for termination of mid trimester pregnancy

机译:研究比较单独静脉内缺索司索甾醇与静脉内缺索司甾醇和血管内福利导管终止妊娠期妊娠终止

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The main concern of obstetrician is to provide the most effective and safest regimen for mid trimester termination of pregnancy which combines the shortest expulsion interval with least side effects. The combination of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for second trimester pregnancy termination has been described in previous studies with conflicting results. Hence gap exists in literature and not adequate evidence available so this study is undertaken. Methods: A prospective and interventional randomized comparative study was conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynecology, tertiary care centre, New Delhi. A total 60 pregnant female of 14 to 20 weeks of gestation who were admitted for termination of pregnancy due to any indication included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups (30 patients in each group). Group A (misoprostol and foleys combination group) and Group B (misoprostol group). Quantitative variables were compared with unpaired t-test/Mann-whitney test (when the data sets were not normally distributed) between the two groups and qualitative variables were compared by using chi-square test/Fisher’s exact test. Results: The mean induction to abortion interval was 18.31±1.95 hours in the female where misoprostol and foleys combination was used and 21.90±2.62 hours in the women where misoprostol alone used group. Authors found a significant reduction in induction to expulsion time in misoprostol and foleys combination group as compared to misoprostol alone group for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy. Total required dose of misoprostol use for termination of pregnancy was significantly less (p 0.008) in the women where both misoprostol and foleys was used than misoprostol alone. Conclusions: With the use of intracervical Foley’s catheter, the duration from induction to expulsion of abortus gets shortened and required dose of misoprostol is also reduced without any significant increase of side effects.
机译:背景:产科医生的主要关切是为妊娠最有效和最安全的妊娠期终止,相结合了最短的驱逐间隔,最小副作用。在先前的研究结果中,已经描述了在先前的研究结果中描述了静脉内米索前列醇和颈静理杂散导管的组合终止终止。因此,文学中存在差距,而不是足够的证据可获得,因此进行这项研究。方法:在新德里第三次护理中心进行妇产科和妇科进行预期和介入随机化比较研究。由于该研究中的任何指示,共有60名怀孕的妊娠期妊娠的妊娠终止妊娠终止。患者分为两组(每组30名患者)。 A组(Misoprostol和Foleys组合组)和B组(Misoprostol组)。通过使用Chi-Square Test / Fisher的确切测试比较了两组和定性变量之间的未配对T-Test / Mann-Whitney测试(当数据集没有正常分布)进行定量变量。结果:在母前司醇和Foleys组合使用的母前司醇和Foleys组合的雌性中,堕胎间隔的平均诱导为18.31±1.95小时,单独使用米索前列醇的女性中21.90±2.62小时。作者发现,与Misoprostol单独妊娠中期终止终止的单独组相比,乳房前司醇和Foleys组合组的诱导诱导减少了诱导时间。在使用的女性中,乳房前列醇和Foleys的终止终止剂量的总需要剂量的乳己酮用于妊娠的用量显着较低(p 0.008)。结论:利用intracercical Foley的导管,从诱导到排除的诱导患者缩短,所需剂量的米索前列醇也减少而无需任何显着增加的副作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号