...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research >Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Oral Hypoglycemic Drugs for the Treatment of Type-II Diabetes Mellitus in a Tertiary Care Setup Karachi
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Oral Hypoglycemic Drugs for the Treatment of Type-II Diabetes Mellitus in a Tertiary Care Setup Karachi

机译:口腔降血糖药物治疗三级护理设置karachi的糖尿病的成本效果分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim of the study was to analyze the current prescription pattern and compare the cost-effectiveness parameter of oral monotherapy and combination hypoglycemic drugs among type-II diabetes mellitus. A cross sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital of Karachi Pakistan for a period of six months. A total of 377 diabetic type II patients were enrolled via purposive sampling method. Detailed sheets were prepared based on objectives of study for analysis of prescription and cost effective therapy. Out of total 377 enrolled type-II diabetes mellitus 70.8% (n=267and 29.2% (n=110) were females with mean age of 36.16±11.15, the prescription status showed that 18.30% (n=69) received monotherapy and 57.30% (n=216) of dual drug therapy and 24.40% (n=92) of triple therapy among combination therapy of oral antidiabetic drugs. The effectiveness of treatment is considered for the treatment obtaining lesser values for ICER hence the value of ICER among mono drug therapies for Glibenclamide 5mg was -720, with baseline value for HbA1C 7.6±0.99, and effectiveness of 0.5, with %E of 0.8.For glimepiride 2mg the ICER was calculated as -2160, with baseline of 7.2±1.5, IE -0.5and ?E 0.3 of from class alpha glucose inhibitor for voglibose 0.3mg ICER was obtained-800, with baseline HbA1C of 7.5±2.1, IE 0.1, and ?E 0.5% as shown in below table 4. The ICER for the add on therapy of Glibenclamide 2.5mg+Metforming 500mg with baseline value of 8.1±2.1 with ?E of 0.3%, and incremental cost (IC) of -10087.2 was obtained 0. ICER was also 0 for sitagliptin 50mg +metformin 500mg with baseline 7.8±0.5, ?E 0.6% and IE value of 0. ICER value of sitagliptin 50mg +metformin 850mg was obtained -648 with ?E 0.1%, IE value -0.5. An ICER value of -2676 was obtained for metformin 850mg +pioglitazone 15mg with baseline of 7.6±1.7 and ?E of 0.4% and IE of this therapy was 0.3. The outcome of drug utilization studies evaluates the current prescribing pattern of oral hypoglycemic agents and concomitant drugs with respect to the clinical efficacy of hypoglycemic drugs.
机译:该研究的目的是分析当前的处方模式,并比较II型糖尿病中口服单药治疗和组合低血糖药物的成本效益参数。横截面研究在卡拉奇巴基斯坦的第三个月内进行了六个月的时间。通过有目的采样方法注册了377型糖尿病II患者。根据分析处方和成本效益治疗的研究目标,制备详细的纸张。总共377型糖尿病患者70.8%(n = 267和29.2%(n = 110)是平均年龄为36.16±11.15的雌性,处方状态显示18.30%(n = 69)接受单药治疗和57.30% (n = 216)双药物治疗和24.40%(n = 92)的口腔抗糖尿病药物的联合治疗中的三重治疗。治疗的有效性被认为是治疗获得较低的标志物的价值,因此单声道药物中的转换价值Glibenclamide 5mg的疗法为-720,HBA1C的基线值为7.6±0.99,效果为0.8,%e为0.8.对于GlimePiride 2mg,转换器计算为-2160,基线为7.2±1.5,即-0.5 α从α血糖抑制剂的e 0.3获得voglibose 0.3mg iner-800,基线Hba1c为7.5±2.1,即0.1,Δe0.5%,如下表4所示。添加术治疗Glibenclamide 2.5mg +金属格式500mg,基线值为8.1±2.1,Δe为0.3%,增量成本(IC)为-10087.2获得0.用基线的SITAGLIPTIN 50mg +二甲双胍500mg也是0.用基线7.8±0.5,Δe0.6%,即SITAGLIPTIN 50mg +二甲双胍850mg的转换值,Δe0.1%,即值-0.5。对于二甲双胍850mg +吡格列酮15mg获得-2676的转换值,基线为7.6±1.7,α为0.4%,即该疗法为0.3。药物利用研究的结果评估了对低血糖药物临床疗效的口服降糖剂的现行规定模式和伴随药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号