首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Occupational Hygiene >Evaluating Human Errors using HEART and TRACEr Methods: Case Study at a Petrochemical Plant
【24h】

Evaluating Human Errors using HEART and TRACEr Methods: Case Study at a Petrochemical Plant

机译:使用心脏和示踪方法评估人类误差:石油化工植物的案例研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Human error is one of the most important factors contributing to accidents. Unfortunately, in many reported accidents, a human error such as Bhopal, Three Mile Island, and Chernobyl played a significant role. The purpose of this research was to identify and evaluate the human errors that happened by the butene-1 unit’s control room operators in a petrochemical industry using Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique (HEART) and Technique for the Retrospective and Predictive Analysis of Cognitive Errors (TRACEr) methods. In this study, 9 control room operators in a petrochemical industry unit based on the three-shift work schedule was investigated in 2016. The census sampling method was used to select sample size through all operators. The data were collected using observation methods, interview with control room’s operator, and shift controller as well as by previous incidents assessment. The research included three major parts. In the first part, all functions of control room operators were analyzed and a Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA) was conducted. In the second part of this research, the types and reasons of human errors in each task were identified by the TRACEr method. Finally, in the third part, HEART method was applied regarding each job to review tasks, human error pre-condition impact factors, and determine the risk of error. In the current study, 2273 External Error Modes (EEM’s), 1768 Internal Error Modes (IEM’s), 1401 Performance Shaping Factors (PFS’s), 1185 Psychological Error Mechanism (PEM’s) were identified in the petrochemical plant’s control rooms. According to the results obtained from the TRACEr technique, the most influential factors affecting the occurrence of human errors happened by the control room operators were alertness, concentration, fatigue, improper use of communication devices, and the quality of communication. Based on the findings, the most effective performance shaping factors for control room operators were alertness, concentration, and fatigue, respectively. Since, control room operators had to repeat tasks in a seated posture and in front of a monitor which may cause to decrease their alertness, concentration, and increase fatigue. So it is recommended to use smart ergonomic chairs for control room operators to prevent loss of consciousness.
机译:人为错误是有助于事故的最重要因素之一。遗憾的是,在许多报告的事故中,诸如博帕尔,三英里岛和切尔诺贝利等人的错误发挥了重要作用。本研究的目的是识别和评估丁烯-1单位控制室运营商在石油化工行业中发生的人类错误,采用人为误差评估和减少技术(心脏)和技术的回顾和预测认知误差分析(示踪剂)方法。在本研究中,在2016年研究了基于三班工作时间表的石化工业单位中的9个控制室运营商。人口普查采样方法用于通过所有操作员选择样本大小。使用观察方法,采访控制室的操作员以及之前的事件评估来收集数据。该研究包括三个主要部分。在第一部分中,分析了控制室运营商的所有功能,并进行了分层任务分析(HTA)。在本研究的第二部分中,通过示踪方法识别每个任务中人类错误的类型和原因。最后,在第三部分中,对每个作业的心脏方法进行了应用,以审查任务,人为错误预处理影响因素,并确定错误的风险。在目前的研究中,2273个外部误差模式(EEM),1768内部错误模式(IEM),1401个性能塑造因子(PFS),1185型心理误差机制(PEM)在石油化工厂的控制室中确定。根据从跟踪技术获得的结果,影响控制室运营商发生的人为错误发生的最有影响力因素是警觉,浓缩,疲劳,通信设备的使用不当,以及通信质量。基于调查结果,控制室运营商的最有效性能塑造因子分别是警觉性,浓度和疲劳。由于控制室运营商必须以坐姿和监测器前方重复任务,这可能导致减少其警觉性,浓度和增加疲劳。因此,建议使用智能人体工学椅子进行控制室运营商,以防止丧失意识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号