首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Forestry Research >Evaluating Sensitivity of the Ranking of Forest Fuel Treatments to Manager’s Risk Attitudes and the Importance of Treatment Objectives, Montana, USA
【24h】

Evaluating Sensitivity of the Ranking of Forest Fuel Treatments to Manager’s Risk Attitudes and the Importance of Treatment Objectives, Montana, USA

机译:评估森林燃料处理排名对经理风险态度的敏感性以及治疗目标的重要性,蒙大拿,美国

获取原文
           

摘要

This study develops a conceptual framework for evaluating the sensitivity of the ranking of forest fuel treatment strategies (FTSs) to variation in managers’ risk attitudes and the importance ratings managers assign to fuel treatment objectives and demonstrates the application of the framework using a case study. The conceptual framework involves (1) defining a utility function on an index that is a weighted average of fuel treatment objectives and incorporates a manager’s risk attitude; (2) using the utility function to calculate utility values for FTSs; (3) applying the stochastic efficiency with respect to a function method to utility values to obtain certainty equivalents (CEs); and (4) ranking FTSs based on statistically significant differences in median CEs for pairs of FTSs. The case study involves three (federal, state, and private) forested areas in Flathead County, Montana, USA, three FTSs (i.e., Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Priority; CWPP & Wildland-Urban Interface Priority; and No Priority), three treatment objectives (i.e., minimizing expected residential monetary losses from wildfire, minimizing expected deviation of forest ecological conditions from their historic range and variability, and maximizing expected net returns from timber harvesting associated with fuel treatment), two risk attitudes (i.e., almost risk neutral and highly risk averse), and 35 weight scenarios for treatment objectives. Case study results are used to test the hypothesis that the ranking of FTSs is sensitive to manager’s risk attitudes and the importance ratings for management objectives. The ranking of FTSs for the three forested areas was insensitive for an almost risk neutral manager and sensitive for a highly risk averse manager. In general, the case study indicates that the ranking of FTSs is sensitive to both a forest manager’s risk attitudes and the importance ratings assigned to fuel treatment objectives.
机译:本研究开发了一种概念框架,用于评估森林燃料处理策略(FTSS)对管理人员风险态度的变化以及分配给燃料处理目标的重要性评级管理人员的敏感性框架,并展示了使用案例研究的框架的应用。概念框架涉及(1)在索引上定义实用功能,该索引是燃料处理目标的加权平均值,并包含经理的风险态度; (2)使用实用程序函数计算FTSS的实用程序值; (3)对函数方法应用随机效率,以获得确定性等同物(CES); (4)基于对FTS对中位数CES的统计上显着差异进行排名。案例研究涉及Flathead县,蒙大拿,美国,三个FTS的三个(联邦,州和私人)森林地区(即社区野火保护计划(CWPP)优先; CWPP&Wildland-Urban界面优先考虑;而且没有优先级),三个治疗目标(即最小化野火的预期住宿货币损失,最大限度地减少森林生态条件的预期偏差从历史范围和可变性,以及从燃料处理相关的木材收集的预期净回报最大化),两个风险态度(即几乎风险中性和高风险厌恶),以及35个治疗目标的重量情景。案例研究结果用于测试FTS的排名对管理者的风险态度和管理目标的重要评级敏感的假设。三个森林区域的FTS排名对于几乎风险的中性经理,对高度风险的厌恶经理敏感,这是不敏感的。一般而言,案例研究表明,FTS的排名对森林经理的风险态度和分配给燃料处理目标的重要性评级敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号