首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care
【24h】

Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care

机译:促进审计和反馈干预内的行动规划:密集护理中动作实现工具箱的混合方法过程评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Audit and feedback (A&F) is more effective if it facilitates action planning, but little is known about how best to do this. We developed an electronic A&F intervention with an action implementation toolbox to improve pain management in intensive care units (ICUs); the toolbox contained suggested actions for improvement. A head-to-head randomised trial demonstrated that the toolbox moderately increased the intervention's effectiveness when compared with A&F only. To understand the mechanisms through which A&F with action implementation toolbox facilitates action planning by ICUs to increase A&F effectiveness. We extracted all individual actions from action plans developed by ICUs that received A&F with (n?=?10) and without (n?=?11) toolbox for 6?months and classified them using Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory. We held semi-structured interviews with participants during the trial. We compared the number and type of planned and completed actions between study groups and explored barriers and facilitators to effective action planning. ICUs with toolbox planned more actions directly aimed at improving practice (p?=?0.037) and targeted a wider range of practice determinants compared to ICUs without toolbox. ICUs with toolbox also completed more actions during the study period, but not significantly (p?=?0.142). ICUs without toolbox reported more difficulties in identifying what actions they could take. Regardless of the toolbox, all ICUs still experienced barriers relating to the feedback (low controllability, accuracy) and organisational context (competing priorities, resources, cost). The toolbox helped health professionals to broaden their mindset about actions they could take to change clinical practice. Without the toolbox, professionals tended to focus more on feedback verification and exploring solutions without developing intentions for actual change. All feedback recipients experienced organisational barriers that inhibited eventual completion of actions. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02922101 . Registered on 26 September 2016.
机译:审计和反馈(A&F)如果促进行动规划,则更有效,但对如何最好地做到这一点,众所周知。我们开发了一种采用动作实现工具箱的电子A&F干预,以改善重症监护单位(ICU)的疼痛管理;工具箱包含了建议的改进行动。头部到头随机试验表明,与A&F仅相比,工具箱中度增加了干预的效率。要了解A&F与Action实现工具箱的机制有助于ICU的行动计划,以提高A&F效力。我们从ICU开发的行动计划中提取了所有接受A&F的行动计划的所有行动(n?=?10),没有(n?=?11)工具箱6?几个月,并使用临床表现反馈干预理论对它们进行分类。我们在审判期间与参与者进行了半结构化访谈。我们比较了研究组之间计划和完成行动的数量和类型,并探索了障碍和促进者的有效行动规划。工具箱的ICU计划了更多旨在改善实践的行动(P?= 0.037),并与没有工具箱的ICU相比,针对更广泛的实践决定簇。 ICU与工具箱还在研究期间完成了更多的行动,但没有显着(p?= 0.142)。没有工具箱的ICU报告了识别他们可以采取的行动的困难。无论工具箱如何,所有ICU仍然经历了与反馈(低可控性,准确性)和组织背景有关的障碍(竞争优先级,资源,成本)。工具箱帮助健康专业人士扩大他们可以采取的行动来改变临床实践的思维。如果没有工具箱,专业人员往往会在反馈验证和探索解决方案时倾向于更多地关注实际变革的意图。所有反馈收件人均经历了抑制最终完成行动的组织障碍。 ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02922101。 2016年9月26日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号