首页> 外文期刊>Independent Journal of Management & Production >The selection of contract strategies using the analytic network process for oil and gas projects: a case study
【24h】

The selection of contract strategies using the analytic network process for oil and gas projects: a case study

机译:利用石油和天然气项目分析网络进程选择合同策略:案例研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The key objective of this study was to select Oil & Gas projects contract strategies. The ANP method was used in order to achieve this objective. The candidate strategies had multiple, interrelated consequences and generated a series of impacts (technical, commercial and environmental). The study carried out by using the ANP added significant value to the company by making the evaluation and selection processes more transparent and efficient as well as by reducing environmental impacts and optimizing the use of natural resources. A working group was formed to analyze the possible contract strategies for a particularly complex project and an ex post facto analysis was performed. The case study was therefore developed in a setting of investment review by the working group including professionals from different subareas. Those professionals were responsible for recommending the most adequate contract strategy. The working group focused on four possible alternatives (A, B, C and D). However, A and B were discarded for not attending to the restrictions related to the necessary cash and debt impact. Therefore, only C and D were analyzed, taking into account the five criteria with greater relative weight: cost, performance, deadline, control, and number of interfaces. Besides those, other criteria had also a significant contribution to the study. A sensitivity analysis took into account the independence of clusters and did not change the ranking of the alternatives, leading to a robust solution of the problem.
机译:本研究的主要目标是选择石油和天然气项目合同策略。使用ANP方法以实现这一目标。候选战略有多种,相互关联的后果,并产生了一系列影响(技术,商业和环境)。通过使用ANP向公司增加了重要价值,通过使评估和选择流程更加透明和高效,以及减少环境影响并优化自然资源的使用,为公司增加了重要价值。成立了一个工作组,以分析特别复杂的项目可能的合同策略,并进行事前事项分析。因此,工作组的投资审查设定了案例研究,包括来自不同蛛网的专业人士。这些专业人士负责建议最适合最适合的合同策略。工作组重点关注四种可能的替代方案(A,B,C和D)。但是,A和B被丢弃,不参加与必要的现金和债务影响有关的限制。因此,仅考虑到具有更大重量的五个标准的C和D:成本,性能,截止日期,控制和接口数量。除了那些,其他标准对研究也有重要贡献。敏感性分析考虑了集群的独立性,并没有改变替代品的排名,导致问题的强大解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号