首页> 外文期刊>Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological SystemsbElectronic resource >Fit between Conservation Instruments and Local Social Systems: Cases of Co-management and Payments for Ecosystem Services : Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems
【24h】

Fit between Conservation Instruments and Local Social Systems: Cases of Co-management and Payments for Ecosystem Services : Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems

机译:适应保护仪器和地方社会制度:生态系统服务的共同管理和支付案例:社会生态系统的变化和适应

获取原文
           

摘要

We draw on the concept of ‘fit’ to understand how co-management and Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) as governance instruments could better acknowledge local social complexities. Achieving ‘participatory fit’ requires well-designed and fair processes, which enhance local acceptance towards the implemented rules. Thus, such fit can contribute to establishing new institutions in conservation governance. However, previous literature on participation has had strong focus on properties of decision-making processes, which often neglects the question on how local realities effect on local people’s ability and willingness to participate in the work of governance instruments. We approach ‘participatory fit’ by identifying six properties of heterogeneous local social systems that governance instruments need to acknowledge to nurture balanced bottom-up participation: 1) economic resources and structures, 2) relationships to land, 3) level of education, 4) relationships between diverse actors, 5) divergent problem definitions, and 6) local identities. We discuss related sources of misfits and develop proposals on how conservation instruments could function as bridging organizations facilitating polycentric institutional structures that fit better to the social systems they are intended to govern. Such hybridization of governance could avoid pitfalls of considering one particular instrument (e.g. co-management or PES) as a panacea able to create win-win solutions.
机译:我们借鉴了“FIT”的概念,了解如何为生态系统服务(PES)作为治理仪器的共同管理和付款如何更好地确认当地社会复杂性。实现“参与式合适”需要精心设计的和公平的流程,从而提高了对实施规则的局部接受。因此,这种契合可以有助于建立保护治理的新机构。然而,以前的参与文献已经强烈关注决策过程的性质,这往往忽视了局部现实如何影响当地人民能力和参与治理工具的工作的问题。我们通过识别治理仪器需要承认培育均衡的自然的地方社会系统的六个属性来实现“参与式合适”:1)经济资源和结构,2)与土地的关系,3)教育水平,4)不同演员,5)发散问题定义和6)本地身份的关系。我们讨论了相关的不合格来源,并制定关于保护工具如何运作的建议,因为促进了适合他们旨在管理的社会系统更好的多中心机构结构的促进组织。这种治理的这种杂交可以避免考虑一个特定仪器(例如共同管理或PES)作为能够创造双赢解决方案的灵丹妙药的陷阱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号