...
首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences >Evaluation of physical-mechanical properties of self-adhesive versus conventional resin cements
【24h】

Evaluation of physical-mechanical properties of self-adhesive versus conventional resin cements

机译:自粘与常规树脂水泥的物理力学性能评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the microhardness, diametral tensile strength, compressive strength and the rheological properties of self-adhesive versus conventional resin cements. Methods: Specimens of a conventional (RelyX ARC) and 3 self-adhesive (RelyX U200, Maxcem Elite, Bifix SE) types of resin cements were prepared. The Knoop test was used to assess the microhardness, using a Microhardness Tester FM 700. For the diametral tensile strength test, a tensile strength was applied at a speed of 0.6 mm/minute. A universal testing machine was used for the analysis of compressive strength and a thermo-controlled oscillating rheometer was used for the Rheology test. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=0.05) were used for data analysis. Results: According to microhardness analysis, all the cements were statistically similar (p0.05), except for Maxcem that presented lower hardness compared with the other cements in relation to the top surface (p0.05). In the diametral tensile strength test, Relyx U200 and RelyX ARC cements were statistically similar (p0.05), presented higher value when compared to the Maxcem and Bifix cements (p0.05). The compressive strength of RelyX ARC and Maxcem Elite cements was statistically higher than RelyX U200 and Bifix cements (p0.05). Regarding the rheology test, Maxcem Elite and RelyX ARC cements showed a high modulus of elasticity. Conclusions: The self-adhesive cements presented poorer mechanical properties than conventional resin cement. Chemical structure and types of monomers employed interfere directly in the mechanical properties of resin cements.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较微硬度,径向拉伸强度,抗压强度和自粘性与常规树脂水泥的流变性能。方法:制备常规(依赖X弧)和3种自粘(谷象U200,MAXCEM ELITE,BIFIX SE)的树脂水泥试样。使用微硬度测试仪FM 700来使用Knoop试验来评估显微硬度。对于直径拉伸强度试验,以0.6mm /分钟的速度施加拉伸强度。通用试验机用于分析压缩强度,热控振荡流变仪用于流变检测。单向ANOVA和TUKEY的测试(α= 0.05)用于数据分析。结果:根据显微硬度分析,除了与顶表面相关的其他水泥相比,所有水泥均具有统计学上类似的(P> 0.05),除了与其他水泥相比呈现较低的硬度(P <0.05)。在径向拉伸强度试验中,依赖X U200和依赖X弧水泥在统计学上相似(P> 0.05),与MAXCEM和BIFIX水泥相比,呈现更高的值(P <0.05)。 relyx弧和maxcem精英水泥的抗压强度统计学上高于relyx u200和bifix水泥(p <0.05)。关于流变测试,MAXCEM ELITE和梯形电弧水泥显示出高弹性模量。结论:自粘水泥呈现比常规树脂水泥较差的机械性能。所用化学结构和类型的单体类型直接干扰树脂水泥的机械​​性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号