首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pediatrics >Comparison of antibiotic and acyclovir usage before and after the implementation of an on-site FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel in an academic tertiary pediatric hospital: a retrospective observational study
【24h】

Comparison of antibiotic and acyclovir usage before and after the implementation of an on-site FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel in an academic tertiary pediatric hospital: a retrospective observational study

机译:在学术高等教育医院在现场膜阵列脑膜炎/脑膜炎小组实施之前和之后的抗生素和ACYCLOVIR使用的比较:回顾性观测研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Prompt initiation of empiric therapy is common practice in case of suspected meningitis or encephalitis. However, in children the most common pathogens are viruses that usually do not require and are not covered by the applied anti-infective treatment. Novel multiplex PCR (mPCR) panels provide rapid on-site diagnostic testing for a variety of pathogens. This study compared empiric antibiotic and acyclovir usage before and after the introduction of an on-site FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel (FA ME Panel). We retrospectively compared data for empiric antibiotic and acyclovir usage between pediatric patients with suspected central nervous system (CNS) infection receiving mPCR testing and a matched historical control group. Patients were matched by age and suspected CNS infection. We included all patients for whom empiric antibiotics and/or acyclovir were prescribed. Each study group consisted of 46 patients with 29 (63.0%) infants and 17 (37.0%) older children. A viral pathogen was diagnosed in 5/46 (10.9%) patients in the control group (all enteroviruses) and in 14/46 (30.4%) patients in the mPCR group (enterovirus n?=?9; human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) n?=?5), (p?=?0.038)). Length of Therapy (LoT) and Days of Therapy (DoT) for antibiotics were significantly lower for infants (4.0 vs. 3.0, p?=?0.038 and 8.0 vs. 6.0, p?=?0.015, respectively). Acyclovir therapy was significantly shorter for both, infants and older children (3.0 vs. 1.0?day, p??0.001 for both age groups). The findings of our study suggest that the introduction of a FA ME Panel into clinical routine procedures is associated with a significantly reduced LoT and DoT of empiric anti-infective treatment in children with suspected meningoencephalitis. The largest effect was observed in infants.
机译:在疑似脑膜炎或脑炎的情况下,迅速启动经验疗法是常见的做法。然而,在儿童中,最常见的病原体是通常不需要的病毒,并且不被应用的抗感染性治疗覆盖。新型多重PCR(MPCr)面板为各种病原体提供了快速现场诊断测试。本研究比较了在现场膜阵列脑膜炎/脑炎面板(FA ME小组)之前和之后的经验抗生素和ACYCLOVIR使用。我们回顾性地比较了对疑似中枢神经系统(CNS)感染的儿科患者验证抗生素和ACYCLOVIR的数据进行了回顾性,接受MPCR测试和匹配的历史对照组。患者与年龄和疑似CNS感染相匹配。我们包括所有患有验证抗生素和/或阿昔洛韦的所有患​​者。每项研究组由46名29例(63.0%)婴儿和17名(37.0%)的年龄患者组成。在对照组(所有肠病病毒)和14/46(30.4%)患者的5/46(10.9%)患者中被诊断出一种病毒病原体(肠道病毒N?=?9;人疱疹病毒6(HHV- 6)n?=?5),(p?= 0.038))。婴儿的抗生素的治疗长度(批次)和治疗日(点)显着降低(4.0与3.0,P?= 0.038和8.0与6.0,P?= 0.015)。 Acyclovir治疗对于婴儿和年龄较大的儿童(3.0与1.0?日,P?<0.001,两岁群体)显着更短。我们的研究结果表明,将FA ME小组引入临床常规程序与疑似脑膜炎患儿的儿童显着降低的批次和透视抗感染治疗有关。在婴儿中观察到最大的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号