...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >The impact of limb loading and the measurement modality (2D versus 3D) on the measurement of the limb loading dependent lower extremity parameters
【24h】

The impact of limb loading and the measurement modality (2D versus 3D) on the measurement of the limb loading dependent lower extremity parameters

机译:肢体加载和测量模态(2D与3D)的影响对肢体加载依赖性下肢参数的测量

获取原文
           

摘要

Deformity assessment and preoperative planning of realignment surgery are conventionally based on weight-bearing (WB) radiographs. However, newer technologies such as three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning and surgical navigation with patient-specific instruments (PSI) rely on non-weight bearing (NWB) computed tomography (CT) data. Additionally, differences between conventional two-dimensional (2D) and 3D measurements are known. The goal of the present study was to systematically analyse the influence of WB and the measurement modality (2D versus 3D) on common WB-dependent measurements used for deformity assessment. 85 lower limbs could be included. Two readers measured the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) in 2D WB and 2D NWB radiographs, as well as in CT-reconstructed 3D models using an already established 3D measurement method for HKA, and a newly developed 3D measurement method for JLCA, respectively. Interrater and intermodality reliability was assessed. Significant differences between WB and NWB measurements were found for HKA (p??0.001) and JLCA (p??0.001). No significant difference could be observed between 2D HKA NWB and 3D HKA (p?=?0.09). The difference between 2D JLCA NWB and 3D JLCA was significant (p??0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the interrater agreement was almost perfect for all HKA and 3D JLCA measurements and substantial for 2D JLCA WB and 2D JLCA NWB. ICC for the intermodality agreement was almost perfect between 2D HKA WB and 2D HKA NWB as well as between 2D HKA NWB and 3D HKA, whereas it was moderate between 2D JLCA WB and 2D JLCA NWB and between 2D JLCA NWB and 3D JLCA. Limb loading results in significant differences for both HKA and JLCA measurements. Furthermore, 2D projections were found to be insufficient to represent 3D joint anatomy in complex cases. With an increasing number of surgical approaches based on NWB CT-reconstructed models, research should focus on the development of 3D planning methods that consider the effects of WB on leg alignment.
机译:重新调整手术的畸形评估和术前规划是常规基于负重(WB)X光片。然而,较新技术,如三维(3D)术前规划和手术导航与患者专用仪器(PSI)依赖于非重量轴承(NWB)计算断层扫描(CT)数据。另外,已知传统二维(2D)和3D测量之间的差异。本研究的目的是系统地分析WB和测量模态(2D与3D)对用于畸形评估的常见WB依赖性测量的影响。可以包括85个下肢。两个读者在2D WB和2D NWB射线照片中测量臀部膝关节角(HKA)和接合线收敛角(JL​​CA),以及使用已经建立的HKA的3D测量方法在CT重建的3D模型中,以及新开发了JLCA的3D测量方法。评估Interrater和互相性可靠性。对HKA(P?<0.001)和JLCA(P≤0.001)发现WB和NWB测量之间的显着差异。在2D HKA NWB和3D HKA之间没有观察到显着差异(P?= 0.09)。 2D JLCA NWB和3D JLCA之间的差异很大(P?<?0.001)。 Interrade Applation的跨界相关系数(ICC)几乎是完美的所有香港和3D JLCA测量和2D JLCA WB和2D JLCA NWB的实质性。 ICC为互相协议几乎完善了2D HKA WB和2D HKA NWB以及2D HKA NWB和3D HKA,而2D JLCA WB和2D JLCA NWB和2D JLCA NWB和3D JLCA之间是适中的。 LIMB加载导致HKA和JLCA测量的显着差异。此外,发现2D突起不足以在复杂的情况下代表3D关节解剖学。随着基于NWB CT重建模型的越来越多的手术方法,研究应侧重于3D规划方法的开发,以考虑WB对腿部对齐的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号