...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Efficacy of smartphone-based Mobile learning versus lecture-based learning for instruction of Cephalometric landmark identification
【24h】

Efficacy of smartphone-based Mobile learning versus lecture-based learning for instruction of Cephalometric landmark identification

机译:基于智能手机的移动学习与基于讲座的学习的疗效,用于Cephalometric地标识别的教学

获取原文
           

摘要

Considering the increasing popularity of electronic learning, particularly smartphone-based mobile learning, and its reportedly optimal efficacy for instruction of complicated topics, this study aimed to compare the efficacy of smartphone-based mobile learning versus lecture-based learning for instruction of cephalometric landmark identification. This quasi-experimental interventional study evaluated 53 dental students (4th year) in two groups of intervention (n?=?27; smartphone instruction using an application) and control (n?=?26, traditional lecture-based instruction). Two weeks after the instructions, dental students were asked to identify four landmarks namely the posterior nasal spine (PNS), orbitale (Or), articulare (Ar) and gonion (Go) on lateral cephalograms. The mean coordinates of each landmark identified by orthodontists served as the reference point, and the mean distance from each identified point to the reference point was reported as the mean consistency while the standard deviation of this mean was reported as the precision of measurement. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 18 via independent sample t-test. No significant difference was noted between the two groups in identification of PNS, Ar or Go (P??0.05). However, the mean error rate in identification of Or was significantly lower in smartphone group compared with the traditional learning group (P?=?0.020). Smartphone-based mobile learning had a comparable, and even slightly superior, efficacy to lecture-based learning for instruction of cephalometric landmark identification, and may be considered, at least as an adjunct, to enhance the instruction of complicated topics. This is not a human subject research. https://ethics.research.ac.ir/ProposalCertificateEn.php?id=33714&Print=true&NoPrintHeader=true&NoPrintFooter=true&NoPrintPageBorder=true&LetterPrint=true .
机译:考虑到越来越多的电子学习,特别是智能手机的移动学习的普及,以及其对复杂主题的指导的据报道最佳的效果,这项研究旨在比较基于智能手机的移动学习与基于讲座的学习的讲座的仪表识别教学的效果。这种准实验介入研究在两组干预中评估了53名牙科学生(第4岁)(n?=?27;使用应用程序的智能手机指令)和控制(n?=?26,基于传统的讲座的指令)。说明两周后,要求牙科学生识别四个地标,即后鼻脊柱(PNS),轨道(或),Articalare(AR)和横向头骨图中的Gonion(Go)。通过正畸师识别的每个地标的平均坐标作为参考点,并且从每个鉴定点与参考点的平均距离被报告为平均一致性,而这种平均值的标准偏差被报告为测量的精度。通过独立样本T检验使用SPSS版本18分析数据。在鉴定PNS,AR或GO的两组之间没有发现显着差异(P?> 0.05)。然而,与传统学习组相比,智能手机组鉴定或识别或显着降低的平均误差率(P?= 0.020)。基于智能手机的移动学习具有可比性,甚至略有优越,效率为基于讲座的学习,用于Cephalometric地标识别的指导,并且可以被认为至少作为辅助,以增强复杂主题的指令。这不是人类主题研究。 https://ethics.research.ac.ir/proposalcertificateen.php?id=33714&print=true& noprintheader=true& nomplintfooter=true& noplintpageborder=true& netterprint=true。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号