首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Number of consulting medical institutions and risk of polypharmacy in community-dwelling older people under a healthcare system with free access: a cross-sectional study in Japan
【24h】

Number of consulting medical institutions and risk of polypharmacy in community-dwelling older people under a healthcare system with free access: a cross-sectional study in Japan

机译:在具有自由访问的医疗保健系统下社区住宅老年人的咨询医疗机构咨询管理次数以及复数人的风险:日本的横断面研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Under the Japanese free access healthcare system, patients are allowed to consult multiple medical institutions (including clinics and hospitals for general or specialist consultation) without primary care referral. This potentially increases the risk of polypharmacy. We examined the association between the number of consulting medical institutions and polypharmacy under a healthcare system with free access. Via a self-administered questionnaire, we identified people aged ≥65?years with ≥1 disease and ≥1 consulting medical institution in a Japanese city in 2016. The exposure of interest was the number of consulting medical institutions (1, 2, or?≥3) and the outcome was polypharmacy (use of ≥6 types of drugs). We performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusting for age, sex, household economy, and the number and type of comorbidities. To minimize confounding effects, we also performed propensity-score-matched analysis, categorizing patients into two groups: 1 and ≥2 consulting medical institutions. Of 993 eligible individuals (mean (standard deviation) age: 75.1 (6.5) years, men: 52.6%), 15.7% (156/993) showed polypharmacy. Proportions of polypharmacy were 9.7% (50/516), 16.6% (55/332), and 35.2% (51/145) for people who consulted 1, 2, and ≥3 medical institutions, respectively. Relative to people who consulted 1 medical institution, adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for polypharmacy were 1.50 (0.94–2.37) and 3.34 (1.98–5.65) for those who consulted 2 and ≥3 medical institutions, respectively. In propensity score matching, of 516 and 477 patients who consulted 1 and ≥2 medical institutions, 307 pairs were generated. The proportion of polypharmacy was 10.8% (33/307) and 17.3% (53/307), respectively (P?=?0.020). The odds ratio for polypharmacy (≥2 vs. 1 consulting medical institution) was 1.73 (95% confidence interval 1.09–2.76). Patients who consulted more medical institutions were more likely to show polypharmacy. The results could encourage physicians and pharmacists to collect medication information more actively and conduct appropriate medication reviews. Strengthening primary care is needed to address the polypharmacy issue, especially in countries with healthcare systems with free access.
机译:在日本的自由进入医疗保健系统下,没有初级保健推荐,允许患者咨询多个医疗机构(包括一般或专业咨询的诊所和医院)。这可能增加了多药物的风险。我们在具有自由访问权限的医疗保健系统下审查了咨询医疗机构和多酚省级之间的协会。通过自我管理的调查问卷,我们鉴定了≥65岁的人,2016年在日本城市中≥1次疾病和≥1顾问。兴趣的曝光是咨询医疗机构的数量(1,2,或? ≥3)结果是复数(使用≥6种药物)。我们进行了多元逻辑回归分析,调整年龄,性别,家庭经济以及合并症的数量和类型。为了最大限度地减少混淆效应,我们还进行了倾向 - 分数匹配的分析,将患者分为两组:1和≥2咨询医疗机构。符合条件的人(平均值(标准差)年龄:75.1(6.5)年,男性:52.6%),15.7%(156/993)显示多耕地。复数的比例为9.7%(50/516),16.6%(55/332)和35.2%(51/145),分别为1,2和≥3个医疗机构咨询。相对于咨询1个医疗机构的人,调整后的多药裁判(95%置信区间)分别为咨询2和≥3个医疗机构的人员为1.50(0.94-2.37)和3.34(1.98-5.65)。在倾向得分匹配中,516和477名咨询1和≥2个医疗机构的患者,产生了307对。多酚省期的比例分别为10.8%(33/307)和17.3%(53/307)(P?= 0.020)。复数(≥2与1咨询医疗机构)的赔率比为1.73(95%置信区间1.09-2.76)。咨询更多医疗机构的患者更有可能表现出多酚职业。结果可以鼓励医生和药剂师更积极地收集药物信息并进行适当的药物评论。需要加强初级保健来解决多酚省期问题,特别是在具有免费访问的医疗保健系统的国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号