...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation >Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring a single leg squat
【24h】

Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring a single leg squat

机译:用于测量单腿蹲下的新型Kinect的软件程序的可靠性和有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

The Single leg squat (SLS) is a movement screening test widely used in clinical settings. The SLS is highly subjective in its nature. Objective measures, such as 3D-motion analyses, are seldom used in daily clinical work. An interactive, Kinect-based 3D-movement analysis system, the Qinematic?, is proposed to be easily used in clinical settings to assess the SLS. The aim of this study was to establish the test-retest reliability and construct validity of Qinematic? for assessing the SLS. A further aim was to identify angles of medial knee displacement, to summarise the discriminative ability of the SLS measured by Qinematic?. We performed a test-retest reliability study (n?=?37) of the SLS using Qinematic? and a construct validity study, in which Qinematic? data were compared with visual assessment of video-recorded SLS. Three variables (left knee down, right knee up and down) reached “substantial reliability” (ICC?=?0.64–0.69). One variable, “left knee up”, showed a significant difference between the two test occasions (T1–6.34°, T2 0.66°, p?=?0.013, ICC?=?0.50), and “poor absolute reliability” was seen for all variables (SEM?=?9.04–10.66, SDC?=?25.06–29.55). A moderate agreement between the visual assessment and Qinematic? data for various knee angles was shown (Kappa?=?0.45–0.58). The best discriminative ability of the SLS was found at a knee angle of 6° (AUC?=?0.82, sensitivity?=?0.86, specificity?=?0.78, PPV?=?0.58, NPV?=?0.94). Qinematic? shows a poor absolute reliability, and a substantial relative reliability, in measuring a SLS at the way down. This indicates that Qinematic? should not be recommended for the use on an individual level, but it can possibly be used on a group level. The merged results of the construct validity study indicate that Qinematic? at 6° of medial displacement can identify subjects with a knee over foot position. In summary, the use of the Qinematic? net trajectory angle, which estimates the “line of best fit” cannot be recommended to assess a knee medial to foot position and should be reconsidered.
机译:单腿蹲(SLS)是临床环境中广泛应用的运动筛选试验。 SLS在其性质上是非常主观的。客观措施如3D-运动分析,很少用于日常临床工作。基于互相的基于Kinect的3D运动分析系统,QineMatic?,以便在临床环境中轻松使用以评估SLS。本研究的目的是建立测试 - 保持最高可靠性并构建QINEMATION的有效性?用于评估SLS。进一步的目的是识别内侧膝关节位移的角度,总结通过QINEMATIC的SLS的辨别能力。我们使用QineMatic进行了一项测试 - 重度可靠性研究(N?= 37)的SLS?和构建有效性研究,其中qinematic?将数据与视频录制SLS的视觉评估进行比较。三个变量(左膝关节,右膝盖上下)达到“实质性可靠性”(ICC?= 0.64-0.69)。一个变量“左膝盖”,在两个测试场合(t1-6.34°,t2 0.66°,p≤0.013,ICC?0.50)和“绝对可靠性差”之间存在显着差异所有变量(SEM?=?9.04-10.66,SDC?=?25.06-29.55)。视觉评估和QineMatic之间适度协议?显示了各种膝关节角的数据(κ?= 0.45-0.58)。 SLS的最佳辨别能力在6°(AUC?= 0.82,灵敏度?=Δ= 0.86,特异性?=?0.78,PPV?=?0.58,NPV?0.94)。秦始学?在向下测量SLS时,显示绝对可靠性和具有大量相对可靠性的差。这表明QineMatic?不应推荐用于个人级别的用途,但它可能会在组级别使用。构建有效性研究的合并结果表明QineMatic?在6°的内侧位移可以识别膝盖以上的主体。总之,使用QINEMATIC?净轨迹角度,估计“最佳拟合线”无法建议评估膝盖内侧到脚位置,并应重新考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号