首页> 外文期刊>BMC research notes >Comparative analysis of four methods to extract DNA from paraffin-embedded tissues: effect on downstream molecular applications
【24h】

Comparative analysis of four methods to extract DNA from paraffin-embedded tissues: effect on downstream molecular applications

机译:从石蜡包埋组织中提取DNA的四种方法的比较分析:对下游分子应用的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background A large portion of tissues stored worldwide for diagnostic purposes is formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE). These FFPE-archived tissues are an extremely valuable source for retrospective (genetic) studies. These include mutation screening in cancer-critical genes as well as pathogen detection. In this study we evaluated the impact of several widely used DNA extraction methods on the quality of molecular diagnostics on FFPE tissues. Findings We compared 4 DNA extraction methods from 4 identically processed FFPE mammary-, prostate-, colon- and lung tissues with regard to PCR inhibition, real time SNP detection and amplifiable fragment size. The extraction methods, with and without proteinase K pre-treatment, tested were: 1) heat-treatment, 2) QIAamp DNA-blood-mini-kit, 3) EasyMAG NucliSens and 4) Gentra Capture-Column-kit. Amplifiable DNA fragment size was assessed by multiplexed 200-400-600 bp PCR and appeared highly influenced by the extraction method used. Proteinase K pre-treatment was a prerequisite for proper purification of DNA from FFPE. Extractions with QIAamp, EasyMAG and heat-treatment were found suitable for amplification of fragments up to 400 bp from all tissues, 600 bp amplification was marginally successful (best was QIAamp). QIAamp and EasyMAG extracts were found suitable for downstream real time SNP detection. Gentra extraction was unsuitable. Hands-on time was lowest for heat-treatment, followed by EasyMAG. Conclusions We conclude that the extraction method plays an important role with regard to performance in downstream molecular applications.
机译:背景技术在全球诊断目的存储全球的大部分组织是福尔马林固定和石蜡嵌入式(FFPE)。这些FFPE归档的组织是回顾性(遗传)研究的极其有价值的来源。这些包括癌症关键基因中的突变筛选以及病原体检测。在这项研究中,我们评估了几种广泛使用的DNA提取方法对FFPE组织的分子诊断质量的影响。结果我们将4个DNA提取方法与4个相同加工的FFPE乳房,前列腺抑制,实时SNP检测和可放大的片段尺寸相比,4 DNA提取方法与4个相同加工的FFPE乳腺癌,前列腺,结肠和肺组织进行比较。提取方法,无蛋白酶K预处理,测试为:1)热处理,2)QiaAMP DNA-血液 - 迷你试剂盒,3)Easymag核素和4)Gentra Capture-Tolum-套件。通过多路复用200-400-600bp PCR评估可增加的DNA片段尺寸,并通过所用的提取方法出现高度影响。蛋白酶K预处理是从FFPE适当纯化DNA的先决条件。发现与QiaAMP,Easymag和热处理的提取适用于从所有组织中扩增碎片,600bp扩增略微成功(最佳是QiaAmp)。发现Qiaamp和Easymag提取物适用于下游实时SNP检测。养老产萃取不合适。热处理的动手时间最低,其次是Easymag。结论我们得出结论,提取方法在下游分子应用中的性能起着重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号