...
首页> 外文期刊>Scientific reports. >Comparison of cytological adequacy and pain scale score in ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid thyroid nodules for liquid-based cytology with with 23- and 25-gauge needles: a single-center prospective study
【24h】

Comparison of cytological adequacy and pain scale score in ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid thyroid nodules for liquid-based cytology with with 23- and 25-gauge needles: a single-center prospective study

机译:单中心前瞻性研究比较超声引导的固体甲状腺结节细针穿刺抽吸甲状腺实性结节的液基细胞学细胞学检查与疼痛量表得分的比较:单中心前瞻性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

In ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of solid thyroid nodules (STN) using liquid-based cytology (LBC), the most appropriate needle size for LBC remains unclear. This study compared the cytological adequacy and complications associated with using 23- and 25-gauge needles in US-guided FNA of STNs using LBC. US-guided FNA was performed in consecutive patients by one radiologist to diagnose STNs?≥?5?mm in the largest diameter. The one-sampling technique through a single needle puncture and multiple to-and-fro needle motions was used in each patient. The 23- and 25-guage needles were used consecutively each day. After FNA, the pain and complications experienced by each patient were investigated by a nurse, who was blinded to the information of needle gauge used. A cytopathologist retrospectively analyzed the cytological adequacy and cellularity of the cases. Of the 99 STNs, eight (8.1%) exhibited inadequate cytology (4 each with 23- and 25-gauge needles). The rate of cytological adequacy was not statistically different between the groups (p?=?0.631). The mean pain scale values with 23- and 25-gauge needles were 2.1?±?1.3 and 1.6?±?1.3, respectively (p?=?0.135). There were no significant complications in either group. In conclusion, both 23- and 25-gauge needles are useful in LBC because cytological adequacy and complications were not statistically different with both sizes of the needles.
机译:在超声(美国)引导下,使用基于液体的细胞学(LBC)对甲状腺实性结节(STN)进行细针抽吸(FNA)时,对于LBC最合适的针头大小尚不清楚。这项研究比较了使用LBC在美国指导的STN的FNA中使用23和25号针头的细胞学上的充分性和并发症。由一名放射科医师在连续的患者中进行US引导的FNA,以诊断最大直径STN≥5mm。每位患者均采用通过一次穿刺和多次往复运动的单采样技术。每天连续使用23针和25针的针头。 FNA后,由一名护士调查了每位患者所经历的疼痛和并发症,该护士不知道所使用的针规的信息。一名细胞病理学家回顾性分析了病例的细胞学充分性和细胞性。在99个STN中,有八个(8.1%)的细胞学检查不充分(每个有23个和25号针头的4个)。两组之间的细胞学充分率无统计学差异(p = 0.631)。用23号和25号针头的平均疼痛量表值分别为2.1±±1.3和1.6±±1.3(p = 0.135)。两组均无明显并发症。综上所述,在LBC中,23号和25号针头都是有用的,因为两种针头的细胞学适应性和并发症在统计学上均无差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号