...
首页> 外文期刊>Scientific reports. >Non-invasive Estimation of the Intracranial Pressure Waveform from the Central Arterial Blood Pressure Waveform in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patients
【24h】

Non-invasive Estimation of the Intracranial Pressure Waveform from the Central Arterial Blood Pressure Waveform in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patients

机译:特发性常压性脑积水患者的颅内压波形的无创估计

获取原文
           

摘要

This study explored the hypothesis that the central aortic blood pressure (BP) waveform may be used for non-invasive estimation of the intracranial pressure (ICP) waveform. Simultaneous invasive ICP and radial artery BP waveforms were measured in 29 individuals with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). The central aortic BP waveforms were estimated from the radial artery BP waveforms using the SphygmoCor system. For each individual, a transfer function estimate between the central aortic BP and the invasive ICP waveforms was found (Intra-patient approach). Thereafter, the transfer function estimate that gave the best fit was chosen and applied to the other individuals (Inter-patient approach). To validate the results, ICP waveform parameters were calculated for the estimates and the measured golden standard. For the Intra-patient approach, the mean absolute difference in invasive versus non-invasive mean ICP wave amplitude was 1.9?±?1.0?mmHg among the 29 individuals. Correspondingly, the Inter-patient approach resulted in a mean absolute difference of 1.6?±?1.0?mmHg for the 29 individuals. This method gave a fairly good estimate of the wave for about a third of the individuals, but the variability is quite large. This approach is therefore not a reliable method for use in clinical patient management.
机译:这项研究探索了一种假设,即主动脉中央血压(BP)波形可用于颅内压(ICP)波形的非侵入性估计。在29名特发性正常压力脑积水(iNPH)患者中测量了同时侵入性ICP和radial动脉BP波形。使用SphygmoCor系统从the动脉BP波形估计中心主动脉BP波形。对于每个人,发现了主动脉中央血压和有创ICP波形之间的传递函数估计值(患者内方法)。此后,选择给出最佳拟合的传递函数估计值并将其应用于其他个体(患者间方法)。为了验证结果,计算了ICP波形参数以进行估算和测得的黄金标准。对于患者内方法,在29名患者中,有创与无创ICP的平均平均波幅绝对差为1.9?±?1.0?mmHg。相应地,患者间方法导致这29个人的平均绝对差为1.6±1.0±mmHg。这种方法对大约三分之一的个体给出了很好的波浪估计,但是变异性非常大。因此,该方法不是用于临床患者管理的可靠方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号