...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >The perception of simplified and traditional Chinese Characters in the eye of simplified and traditional Chinese readers
【24h】

The perception of simplified and traditional Chinese Characters in the eye of simplified and traditional Chinese readers

机译:简体和繁体中文读者眼中的简体和繁体汉字感知

获取原文
           

摘要

Chinese character expertise involves reduced holistic processing and left side bias/right hemisphere lateralization (Hsiao & Cottrell, 2009). Tso, Au, and Hsiao (2011) recently showed that the reduction in holistic processing was due to writing rather than reading experience; in contrast, the left side bias depended on perceptual experience but not writing experience. Here we examined simplified and traditional Chinese readersa?? perception of simplified and traditional characters. Since simplified script readers do not know how to write traditional characters, they may process traditional characters more holistically than simplified characters (vice versa for traditional script readers). Both participant groups performed a character part-matching task (the complete composite paradigm) for assessing holistic processing, and a chimeric character judgment task for assessing left side bias (Hsiao & Cottrell, 2009), with three types of characters: those shared in the two scripts (Scripts-Shared), unique in the simplified script (Unique-Simplified), and unique in the traditional script (Unique-Traditional). We found that both groups perceived Scripts-Shared and Unique-Traditional characters more holistically than Unique-Simplified characters, suggesting simplified characters required more analytic processing; this effect may be due to higher visual similarity among simplified characters than traditional characters. However, no difference was found in holistic processing between the two participant groups, suggesting that their analytic character processing in one script was transferred to the processing of the other script. In addition, simplified script readers demonstrated weaker left side bias than traditional script readers in perceiving Scripts-Shared and Unique-Simplified characters, but not in perceiving Unique-Traditional characters. This effect is consistent with the recent finding that higher visual similarity among characters may lead to stronger left hemispheric lateralization/weaker left side bias (Hsiao & Cheung, 2011), and that left side bias depends on perceptual experience. In short, simplifying the traditional script leads to reduced holistic processing and weaker left side bias in the readers.
机译:汉字专业知识涉及减少整体处理和左侧偏斜/右半球偏侧化(Hsiao&Cottrell,2009)。 Tso,Au和Hsiao(2011)最近表明,整体处理能力的下降是由于写作而不是阅读经验造成的。相反,左侧偏见取决于感知经验,而不取决于写作经验。在这里,我们研究了简体中文和繁体中文读者。对简化和传统字符的理解。由于简化的脚本阅读器不知道如何编写传统字符,因此与简化的字符相比,他们可以更全面地处理传统字符(对于传统的脚本阅读器,反之亦然)。两组参与者都执行了角色部分匹配任务(完整的复合范例)来评估整体处理,并执行了嵌合字符判断任务来评估左侧偏向(Hsiao&Cottrell,2009),其中包含三种类型的角色:两个脚本(共享脚本),在简化脚本中是唯一的(Unique-Simplified),在传统脚本中是唯一的(Unique-Traditional)。我们发现,两组人都比唯一简化字符更全面地理解了脚本共享字符和唯一传统字符,这表明简化字符需要更多的分析处理。这种效果可能是由于简化字符之间的视觉相似性高于传统字符。但是,两个参与者组在整体处理上没有发现差异,这表明他们在一个脚本中的分析字符处理已转移到另一脚本的处理中。此外,简化脚本阅读器在感知脚本共享和唯一简化字符方面表现出比传统脚本阅读器更弱的左侧偏见,但在感知独特传统字符方面却没有表现出优势。这种效果与最近的发现一致,即字符之间较高的视觉相似性可能导致更强的左半球偏侧性/较弱的左侧偏斜(Hsiao&Cheung,2011),并且左侧偏斜取决于感知经验。简而言之,简化传统脚本会导致整体处理减少,并且读者的左侧偏见会减弱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号