首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Comparative Evaluation of the Marginal Sealing Ability of two Commercially Available Pit and Fissure Sealants
【24h】

Comparative Evaluation of the Marginal Sealing Ability of two Commercially Available Pit and Fissure Sealants

机译:两种市售坑缝密封剂的边缘密封能力的比较评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: The occlusal surfaces of the teeth usually have pits and fissures which provide a good environment for demineralization with minimal salivary access and make them caries prone. The success of pit and fissure sealing materials is highly dependent on the marginal sealing ability of the fissures.Aim: The present study was carried out to evaluate and compare the marginal sealing ability of two commercially available pit and fissure sealants.Materials and Methods: A total of 50 human premolar teeth were used in this invitro study. Group 1 included 25 teeth for application of Clinpro sealant and Group 2 included twenty 25 for application of Helioseal F sealant. Samples were stored in artificial saliva for 72 hours before thermocycling. The samples were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. The sectioned samples were examined under an Optical Stereomicroscope and compared in terms of the extent of microleakage based on the amount of dye penetration between the sealant and tooth substance interface. The dye penetration scores in both the groups was statistically analysed using Chi square test and Mann Whitney Test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.Results: It was seen that in Group 1, 12 samples (48%) had no dye penetration (Grade 0) while in Group 2, 6 samples (24%) demonstrated Grade 0 penetration. Group 2 had the most extensive dye penetration (Grade 3) in 8 of 25 samples (32%) (p=0.014).Conclusion: On comparison of the microleakage scores of the groups, a statistically significant difference was found between the two groups; indicating a much better performance of Clinpro as compared to Helioseal F.
机译:简介:牙齿的咬合面通常有凹坑和裂缝,为唾液接触最少的脱矿物质提供了良好的环境,并使它们易于龋齿。缝隙和缝隙密封材料的成功很大程度上取决于缝隙的边缘密封能力。目的:本研究旨在评估和比较两种市售的缝隙和缝隙密封剂的边缘密封能力。材料与方法:A这项体外研究共使用了50颗人类前磨牙。第一组包括25个用于Clinpro密封剂的牙齿,第二组包括20个25个用于Helioseal F密封剂的牙齿。在热循环之前,将样品在人工唾液中保存72小时。将样品浸入2%的亚甲基蓝溶液中24小时。在光学立体显微镜下检查切片的样品,并根据密封剂和牙齿物质界面之间的染料渗透量对微渗漏程度进行比较。使用卡方检验和曼惠特尼检验对两组的染料渗透得分进行统计分析。 p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:可以看出,在第1组中,有12个样品(48%)没有染料渗透(0级),而在第2组中,有6个样品(24%)没有染料渗透。展示了0级渗透率。第2组在25个样品中的8个(32%)中具有最广泛的染料渗透性(第3级)(p = 0.014)。结论:比较各组的微渗漏评分,发现两组之间有统计学意义的差异;表明与Helioseal F相比,Clinpro的性能要好得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号