...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Discrepancy in Tooth Colored Self Cure Acrylic Provisional Restorations With and Without Reinforcement of Glass Beads: An In-Vitro Study
【24h】

Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Discrepancy in Tooth Colored Self Cure Acrylic Provisional Restorations With and Without Reinforcement of Glass Beads: An In-Vitro Study

机译:牙色自固化丙烯酸临时修复(带和不带玻璃珠)的边缘差异的比较评估:一项体外研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Context: This invitro study was conducted to compare and evaluate marginal discrepancy in two types of tooth colored self cure provisional restorative materials {DPI&UNIFAST TRAD} before and after reinforcement of glass beads. Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare marginal discrepancy in two types of provisional restorative materials (DPI and UNI FAST TRAD) before and after reinforcement with Glass beads.Materials and Methods: Tooth shaped resin copings were fabricated on custom made brass metal die. A total of 60 resin copings were fabricated in which 30 samples were prepared with DPI and 30 samples with UNIFAST material. Each group of 30 samples were divided in to two sub groups in which 15 samples were prepared with glass bead reinforcement and 15 samples without reinforcement. The marginal discrepancy was evaluated with photomicroscope {Reichet Polyvar 2 met} by placing the resin copings on custom made brass resin coping holder.Results: Measurements obtained were statistically analysed by unpaired t-test to know any significance between two variables. Unreinforced DPI specimens had shown lower marginal discrepancy (442.82) than reinforced specimens (585.77). Unreinforced UNIFAST specimens have shown high values of marginal discrepancy (592.83) than reinforced specimens (436.35). p-value between reinforced and unreinforced specimens of DPI (p=0.0013) and UNIFAST (p= 0.0038) has shown statistical significance.Conclusion: This in-vitro study revealed that unreinforced DPI specimens have shown lower marginal discrepancy than reinforced specimens and unreinforced UNIFAST specimens have shown higher values of marginal discrepancy than reinforced specimens.
机译:背景:这项体外研究的目的是比较和评估两种类型的有色自固化临时修复材料{DPI&UNIFAST TRAD}在玻璃珠加固前后的边缘差异。目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较玻璃珠加固前后两种类型的临时修复材料(DPI和UNI FAST TRAD)的边际差异。材料与方法:牙形树脂牙套是根据客户要求定制的黄铜金属模具。总共制造了60个树脂顶盖,其中使用DPI制备了30个样品,使用UNIFAST材料制备了30个样品。每组30个样品分为两个子组,其中15个样品采用玻璃珠增强,而15个样品不采用增强。通过将树脂盖置于定制的黄铜树脂盖上,用光学显微镜{Reichet Polyvar 2 met}评估边缘差异。结果:通过不成对t检验对获得的测量值进行统计分析,以了解两个变量之间的任何显着性。未增强的DPI标本的边际差异(442.82)比增强的标本(585.77)低。未增强的UNIFAST标本的边际差异值(592.83)比增强的标本(436.35)高。 DPI的增强样品和未增强样品(p = 0.0013)和UNIFAST(p = 0.0038)之间的p值具有统计学意义。标本已显示出比增强标本更高的边际差异值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号