...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >An Invitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy and Flow Characteristics for AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, CRCS and Gutta Flow 2 Root Canal Sealer
【24h】

An Invitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy and Flow Characteristics for AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, CRCS and Gutta Flow 2 Root Canal Sealer

机译:体外评估AH Plus,MTA Fillapex,CRCS和Gutta Flow 2根管封闭剂的抗菌功效和流动特性

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Cleaning and shaping of root canal does not guarantee complete disinfection of the canal, regardless of the systems and techniques used for this purpose. Therefore, it becomes mandatory for the endodontic filling materials to have a good antimicrobial potential especially against E. faecalis. This research was aimed therefore to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy and flow properties of different root canal sealers.Aim: To study invitro antimicrobial activity and flow characteristics for Resin based (AH Plus), Mineral Trioxide Aggregate based (MTA Fillapex), Calcium hydroxide based (CRCS) and Flowable Gutta-Percha (Gutta Flow 2) endodontic sealers on Enterococcus faecalis.Materials and Methods: Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 was used to test antibacterial potential of sealers by Agar diffusion test (ADT) and Direct Contact Test (DCT). ADT was performed by punching the sealers on a well of 4×6mm diameter on Muller Hinton agar plates. These plates were inoculated with standard suspension of E. faecalis and the zone of inhibition was measured at 24 hours and after 7 days. All the sealers were prepared in accordance with the manufacturer?s recommendations. Flow of sealers was measured according to ADA specification no. 57.Results: All sealers showed antibacterial activity against E. faecalis except Gutta Flow 2. At 24 hours, zone of inhibition was highest in Calcibiotic Root Canal Sealer (CRCS) and lowest in AH Plus. After 7 days the zone of inhibition decreased in AH plus, CRCS and MTA Fillapex. DCT showed a significant lower number of organisms in AH Plus, CRCS and MTA than controls at both the time intervals. Gutta Flow 2 did not show any significant antimicrobial action. Maximum and minimum flow was shown by AH Plus and CRCS respectively.Conclusion: Highest microbial inhibition was shown by (CRCS), followed by MTA Fillapex and AH Plus. Gutta Flow 2 did not show any inhibition of E. faecalis by ADT. Maximum reduction in antibacterial property with time against E. faecalis was seen with AH Plus. Maximum flow was shown by AH Plus and minimum by CRCS.
机译:简介:根管的清洁和定型并不能保证对根管进行完全消毒,无论用于此目的的系统和技术如何。因此,强制要求牙髓充填材料具有良好的抗菌潜能,尤其是对屎肠球菌。因此,本研究旨在评估不同根管封闭剂的抗菌功效和流动特性。目的:研究树脂基(AH Plus),三氧化二矿骨料(MTA Fillapex),氢氧化钙基(粪肠球菌和可流动的Gutta-Percha牙髓封闭剂(Gutta Flow 2)。材料与方法:粪便肠球菌ATCC 29212通过琼脂扩散试验(ADT)和直接接触试验(DCT)检测封闭剂的抗菌潜力。通过在Muller Hinton琼脂平板上的直径为4×6mm的孔上打孔密封剂来执行ADT。这些平板用粪肠球菌的标准悬浮液接种,并在24小时和7天后测量抑制区域。所有密封剂均按照制造商的建议进行制备。密封剂的流量根据ADA规范No. 57.结果:除Gutta Flow 2之外,所有密封剂均对粪肠球菌具有抗菌活性。在24小时时,钙结合剂根管密封剂(CRCS)的抑制区最高,而AH Plus则最低。 7天后,AH加,CRCS和MTA Fillapex的抑制区减少。在这两个时间间隔内,DCT的AH Plus,CRCS和MTA中的细菌数量均显着低于对照组。 Gutta Flow 2没有显示任何明显的抗菌作用。结论:AH Plus和CRCS分别显示了最大和最小流量。结论:(CRCS)显示了最高的微生物抑制,其次是MTA Fillapex和AH Plus。 Gutta Flow 2没有显示出ADT对粪肠球菌的抑制作用。随着时间的推移,使用AH Plus可以最大程度地降低对屎肠球菌的抗菌性能。 AH Plus显示最大流量,而CRCS显示最小流量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号