首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian veterinary journal >Pilot study to evaluate 3 hygiene protocols on the reduction of bacterial load on the hands of veterinary staff performing routine equine physical examinations
【24h】

Pilot study to evaluate 3 hygiene protocols on the reduction of bacterial load on the hands of veterinary staff performing routine equine physical examinations

机译:进行初步研究以评估3种卫生规程,以减少进行例行马体格检查的兽医人员手上的细菌量

获取原文
           

摘要

Reduction factors (RFs) for bacterial counts on examiners’ hands were compared when performing a standardized equine physical examination, followed by the use of one of 3 hand-hygiene protocols (washing with soap, ethanol gel application, and chlorohexidine-ethanol application). The mean RFs were 1.29 log10 and 1.44 log10 at 2 study sites for the alcohol-gel (62% ethyl alcohol active ingredient) protocols and 1.47 log10 and 1.94 log10 at 2 study sites for the chlorhexidine-alcohol (61% ethyl alcohol plus 1% chlorhexidine active ingredients) protocols, respectively. The RFs were significantly different (P < 0.0001) between the hand-washing group and the other 2 treatment groups (the alcohol-gel and the chlorhexidine-alcohol lotion). The use of alcohol-based gels or chlorhexidine-alcohol hand hygiene protocols must still be proven effective in equine practice settings, but in this study, these protocols were equivalent or superior to hand washing for reduction in bacterial load on the hands of people after they perform routine physical examinations.
机译:在进行标准化的马体格检查时,比较了检查员手上细菌计数的减少因子(RFs),然后使用了3种手卫生规程之一(用肥皂清洗,使用乙醇凝胶和应用氯己定-乙醇)。对于酒精-凝胶(62%乙醇活性成分)方案,在两个研究位点的平均RF为1.29 log10和1.44 log10,对于氯己定醇(61%乙醇加1%)的两个研究位点的平均RF为1.47 log10和1.94 log10洗必泰有效成分)方案。洗手组和其他两个治疗组(酒精凝胶和洗必泰酒精乳液)之间的RF显着不同(P <0.0001)。在马术练习场所中,仍必须证明使用酒精性凝胶或洗必泰酒精手卫生规程是有效的,但是在本研究中,这些规程等效于或优于洗手,以减少人手后的细菌负荷进行例行身体检查。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号