首页> 外文期刊>The Astrophysical journal >Detecting Clusters of Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. I. Monte Carlo Comparison of Cluster Detection Algorithms
【24h】

Detecting Clusters of Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. I. Monte Carlo Comparison of Cluster Detection Algorithms

机译:在斯隆数字天空测量中检测星系团。一,蒙特卡洛算法的聚类检测算法比较

获取原文
           

摘要

We present a comparison of three cluster-finding algorithms from imaging data using Monte Carlo simulations of clusters embedded in a 25 deg2 region of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) imaging data: the matched filter (MF; Postman et al., published in 1996), the adaptive matched filter (AMF; Kepner et al., published in 1999), and a color-magnitude filtered Voronoi tessellation technique (VTT). Among the two matched filters, we find that the MF is more efficient in detecting faint clusters, whereas the AMF evaluates the redshifts and richnesses more accurately, therefore suggesting a hybrid method (HMF) that combines the two. The HMF outperforms the VTT when using a background that is uniform, but it is more sensitive to the presence of a nonuniform galaxy background than is the VTT; this is due to the assumption of a uniform background in the HMF model. We thus find that for the detection thresholds we determine to be appropriate for the SDSS data, the performance of both algorithms are similar; we present the selection function for each method evaluated with these thresholds as a function of redshift and richness. For simulated clusters generated with a Schechter luminosity function (M = -21.5 and α = -1.1), both algorithms are complete for Abell richness 1 clusters up to z ~ 0.4 for a sample magnitude limited to r = 21. While the cluster parameter evaluation shows a mild correlation with the local background density, the detection efficiency is not significantly affected by the background fluctuations, unlike previous shallower surveys.
机译:我们使用成像在25个Sloan数字天空测量(SDSS)成像数据的25度2区域中的集群的蒙特卡罗模拟,从成像数据中提出三种集群发现算法的比较:匹配滤波器(MF; Postman等人,于1996年出版) ),自适应匹配滤波器(AMF; Kepner等人,于1999年出版)和色度滤波的Voronoi镶嵌技术(VTT)。在这两个匹配的滤波器中,我们发现MF在检测微弱簇方面更有效,而AMF可以更准确地评估红移和浓淡,因此建议将两者结合的混合方法(HMF)。当使用均匀背景时,HMF优于VTT,但与VTT相比,它对不均匀星系背景的存在更为敏感。这是由于在HMF模型中假设背景一致。因此,我们发现对于我们确定适合于SDSS数据的检测阈值,两种算法的性能都相似。我们介绍了使用这些阈值评估的每种方法的选择函数,这些函数是红移和丰富度的函数。对于使用Schechter光度函数生成的模拟聚类(M = -21.5和α= -1.1),两种算法均适用于Abell富集度1聚类,直到z〜0.4,样本量限于r =21。而聚类参数评估与先前较浅的调查结果不同,它显示出与局部背景密度的温和相关性,背景波动不会显着影响检测效率。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号