...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Needle-Free Powder Lidocaine Delivery System Provides Rapid Effective Analgesia for Venipuncture or Cannulation Pain in Children: Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Venipuncture and Venous Cannulation Pain After Fast-Onset Needle-Free Powder Lidocaine or Placebo Treatment Trial
【24h】

Needle-Free Powder Lidocaine Delivery System Provides Rapid Effective Analgesia for Venipuncture or Cannulation Pain in Children: Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Venipuncture and Venous Cannulation Pain After Fast-Onset Needle-Free Powder Lidocaine or Placebo Treatment Trial

机译:无针粉状利多卡因输送系统可为儿童的静脉穿刺或插管痛提供快速有效的镇痛:快速发作的无针粉状利多卡因或安慰剂治疗试验后的静脉穿刺和静脉插管痛的随机,双盲比较

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE. The Comparison of Venipuncture and Venous Cannulation Pain After Fast-Onset Needle-Free Powder Lidocaine or Placebo Treatment trial was a randomized, single-dose, double-blind, phase 3 study investigating whether a needle-free powder lidocaine delivery system (a sterile, prefilled, disposable system that delivers lidocaine powder into the epidermis) produces effective local analgesia within 1 to 3 minutes for venipuncture and peripheral venous cannulation procedures in children.METHODS. Pediatric patients (3–18 years of age) were randomly assigned to treatment with the needle-free powder lidocaine delivery system (0.5 mg of lidocaine and 21 ± 1 bar of pressure; n = 292) or a sham placebo system ( n = 287) at the antecubital fossa or the back of the hand 1 to 3 minutes before venipuncture or cannulation. All patients rated the administration comfort of the needle-free systems and the pain of the subsequent venous access procedures with the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (from 0 to 5). Patients 8 to 18 years of age also provided self-reports with a visual analog scale, and parents provided observational visual analog scale scores for their child's venous access pain. Safety also was assessed.RESULTS. Immediately after administration, mean Wong-Baker Faces scale scores were 0.54 and 0.24 in the active system and sham placebo system groups, respectively. After venipuncture or cannulation, mean Wong-Baker Faces scale scores were 1.77 ± 0.09 and 2.10 ± 0.09 and mean visual analog scale scores were 22.62 ± 1.80 mm and 31.97 ± 1.82 mm in the active system and sham placebo system groups, respectively. Parents' assessments of their child's procedural pain were also lower in the active system group (21.35 ± 1.43 vs 28.67 ± 1.66). Treatment-related adverse events were generally mild and resolved without sequelae. Erythema and petechiae were more frequent in the active system group.CONCLUSIONS. The needle-free powder lidocaine delivery system was well tolerated and produced significant analgesia within 1 to 3 minutes.
机译:目的。快速发作无针利多卡因或安慰剂治疗试验后的静脉穿刺和静脉插管疼痛的比较是一项随机,单剂量,双盲的3期研究,旨在研究无针粉末利多卡因输送系统(无菌,预填充的一次性系统,可将利多卡因粉末输送到表皮中)可在1至3分钟内对儿童的静脉穿刺和外周静脉插管过程产生有效的局部镇痛效果。小儿患者(3至18岁)被随机分配使用无针粉末利多卡因输送系统(0.5 mg利多卡因和21±1 bar的压力; n = 292)或假安慰剂系统(n = 287)治疗)在静脉穿刺或插管前1至3分钟,在肘前窝或手背上。所有患者均使用Wong-Baker Faces疼痛评分量表(从0到5)对无针系统的给药舒适性和随后的静脉通路手术的痛苦进行了评分。 8至18岁的患者还提供了自我报告的视觉模拟量表,父母为孩子的静脉通路疼痛提供了观察的视觉模拟量表评分。还评估了安全性。结果。给药后立即,活跃系统组和假安慰剂系统组的Wong-Baker Faces量表平均得分分别为0.54和0.24。静脉穿刺或插管后,主动系统组和假安慰剂系统组的Wong-Baker Faces量表平均得分分别为1.77±0.09和2.10±0.09,平均视觉模拟量表得分分别为22.62±1.80 mm和31.97±1.82 mm。在活动系统组中,父母对孩子程序性疼痛的评估也较低(21.35±1.43对28.67±1.66)。与治疗相关的不良事件通常较轻,可以缓解而没有后遗症。在活动系统组中,红斑和瘀斑更为常见。无针利多卡因粉末给药系统耐受性良好,并在1至3分钟内产生了明显的镇痛作用。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号