首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Increased Rates of Morbidity, Mortality, and Charges for Hospitalized Children With Public or No Health Insurance as Compared With Children With Private Insurance in Colorado and the United States
【24h】

Increased Rates of Morbidity, Mortality, and Charges for Hospitalized Children With Public or No Health Insurance as Compared With Children With Private Insurance in Colorado and the United States

机译:与科罗拉多州和美国的有私人保险的儿童相比,有公共医疗保险或没有医疗保险的住院儿童的发病率,死亡率和收费增加

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND. There has been a gradual decrease in the proportion of children covered by private health insurance in Colorado and the United States with a commensurate increase in those with public insurance or having no insurance which may impact access to care and outcomes.OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this work was to determine whether children with public or no health insurance have differences in hospital admission rates, morbidity, mortality, and/or charges that might be improved if standards of primary care comparable to those of children with private insurance could be achieved.METHODS. We conducted a retrospective comparison of hospitalization-related outcomes for children 18 years of age in Colorado from 1995–2003 and in the United States in 2000. Population-based rates for hospital admission were determined stratified by age, race/ethnicity, disease grouping, and health insurance status.RESULTS. Compared with those with private insurance, children in Colorado and the United States with public or no insurance have significantly higher rates of total hospital admission, as well as admission for chronic illness, asthma, diabetes, vaccine-preventable disease, psychiatric disease, and ruptured appendix. These children have higher mortality rates, higher severity of illness, are more likely to be admitted through the emergency department and have significantly higher hospital charges per insured child. Higher hospitalization rates occur in children who are nonwhite and/or Hispanic and those who are younger. If children with public or no health insurance in the United States in 2000 had the same hospitalization outcomes as children with private insurance, $5.3 billion in hospital charges could have been saved.CONCLUSIONS. There is an opportunity to achieve improved health outcomes and decreased hospitalization costs for children with public or no health insurance if private insurance standards of health care could be achieved for all US children.
机译:背景。在科罗拉多州和美国,接受私人健康保险的儿童比例逐渐减少,而拥有公共保险或没有保险的儿童比例相应增加,这可能会影响获得医疗和结果的机会。这项工作的目的是确定如果可以与私人保险的孩子相比,初级保健的标准可以得到改善,那么是否有公共保险的孩子或没有健康保险的孩子在住院率,发病率,死亡率和/或收费方面是否存在差异可以改善。方法。我们对1995年至2003年在科罗拉多州和2000年在美国的18岁以下儿童的住院相关结局进行了回顾性比较。按年龄,种族/族裔,疾病分组对以医院为基础的住院率进行了分层,以及健康保险状态。结果。与有私人保险的人相比,科罗拉多州和美国有公共保险或没有保险的孩子的总住院率以及慢性病,哮喘,糖尿病,可预防疫苗的疾病,精神病和破裂的住院率要高得多附录。这些孩子的死亡率更高,疾病的严重程度更高,更可能通过急诊室收治,每个被保险孩子的住院费用也明显更高。非白人和/或西班牙裔儿童以及年龄较小的儿童住院率更高。如果2000年美国拥有公共医疗保险或没有医疗保险的儿童的住院治疗结果与拥有私人保险的儿童相同,则可以节省53亿美元的住院费用。如果可以为所有美国儿童实现私人医疗保健标准,则有机会改善有公共保险或没有医疗保险的孩子的健康状况并降低住院费用。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号