首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Psychosocial and Academic Characteristics of Extremely Low Birth Weight (≤800 g) Adolescents Who Are Free of Major Impairment Compared With Term-Born Control Subjects
【24h】

Psychosocial and Academic Characteristics of Extremely Low Birth Weight (≤800 g) Adolescents Who Are Free of Major Impairment Compared With Term-Born Control Subjects

机译:与足月出生的对照对象相比,没有重大障碍的极低出生体重(≤800g)的青少年的社会心理和学术特征

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. To compare academic and cognitive ability, attention, attitudes, and behavior of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) adolescents who are free of major impairments at 17 years of age with term-born control subjects.Methods. Between January 31, 1981, and February 9, 1986, 250 infants of ≤800 g were admitted for intensive care in British Columbia, 98 (39%) of whom survived to late adolescence. Teens with major sensorimotor handicaps and/or IQ 70 were excluded ( n = 19). Of the 79 eligible ELBW teens, 53 (67%) were assessed at 17.3 (16.3–19.7) years (birth weight: 720 [520–800g]; gestation: 26 [23–29] weeks). The test battery screened the following areas: cognitive (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Adults Third Edition, 3 subtests), academic (Wide Range Achievement Test-3), attention (Connors' Continuous Performance Task), self-report (Harter Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents; Job Search Attitude Inventory), and parent report (Child Behavior Check List). A comparison group of term born control subjects ( n = 31) were also assessed (birth weight: 3506 [3068–4196] g; gestation: 40 [39–42] weeks) at age 17.8 (16.5–19.0) years. Multivariate analysis of variance (group × gender) was conducted for each domain (cognitive, academic, self-report, and parent report).Results. The ELBW group showed lower cognitive scores (vocabulary, block design, and digit symbol) and academic skills (reading and arithmetic) compared with control subjects, with no gender differences. There were no differences in attention between the 2 groups using a repetitive computer task. ELBW teens reported lower scholastic, athletic, job competence, and romantic confidence and viewed themselves as more likely to need help from others in finding a job. In the behavioral domain, parents reported their ELBW teens to display more internalizing, more externalizing, and more total problems than the control teens, with ELBW boys showing more problems. ELBW teens showed a higher percentage of clinically significant behavior problems than control subjects.Conclusions. In a provincial cohort of unimpaired survivors of birth weight ≤800 g, psychosocial and educational vulnerabilities persist into late adolescence and may complicate the transition to adult life compared with their peers.
机译:目的。为了比较17岁以下没有重大障碍的极低出生体重(ELBW)青少年的学业和认知能力,注意力,态度和行为,与足月出生的对照受试者进行比较。在1981年1月31日至1986年2月9日之间,不列颠哥伦比亚省收治了250名≤800g的婴儿进行重症监护,其中98名(39%)存活至青春期晚期。排除主要感觉运动障碍和/或智商<70的青少年(n = 19)。在79名合格的ELBW青少年中,有53名(67%)被评估为17.3(16.3-19.7)岁(出生体重:720 [520-800g];妊娠:26 [23-29]周)。该测试电池筛选了以下领域:认知(成人韦氏智能量表,第三版,3个子测验),学术性(范围成就测验3),注意力(康纳斯的持续表现任务),自我报告(Harter自我认知档案)青少年;工作搜索态度清单)和父级报告(儿童行为检查表)。在17.8岁(16.5-19.0)岁时,还评估了一个比较组的足月出生对照受试者(n = 31)(出生体重:3506 [3068-4196] g;妊娠:40 [39-42]周)。对每个领域(认知,学术,自我报告和父母报告)进行了方差的多变量分析(组×性别)。与对照组相比,ELBW组的认知得分(词汇,模块设计和数字符号)和学术技能(阅读和算术)较低,没有性别差异。使用重复性计算机任务,两组之间的注意力没有差异。 ELBW青少年报告了较低的学业,运动,工作能力和浪漫信心,并认为自己更有可能需要他人的帮助才能找到工作。在行为方面,父母报告他们的ELBW青少年比对照组的青少年表现出更多的内在化,更多的内在化和更多的总问题,而ELBW男孩表现出更多的问题。 ELBW青少年表现出的临床显着行为问题比例高于对照组。在省份出生体重≤800g的未受损幸存者队列中,社会心理和教育脆弱性一直持续到青春期后期,与同龄人相比,可能会使向成年人的过渡更加复杂。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号