...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >The Influence of Self-Control and Social Status on Self-Deception
【24h】

The Influence of Self-Control and Social Status on Self-Deception

机译:自我控制和社会地位对自我欺骗的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of self-control and social status on self-deception. The present study adopted a forward-looking paradigm to investigate how self-control and social status influence self-deception. In Experiment 1, participants were asked to complete 10 questions, after they predicted and completed 40 questions (commonsense judgment materials) either with or without answer hints. The results indicated that the participants had higher predicted scores under conditions with answer hints compared with conditions without answer hints and that the predicted scores were much higher than the actual scores under conditions with answer hints. In Experiment 2, individuals with different self-control traits were chosen to perform the operation and induction of the perception of social status and then complete tests such as Experiment 1. The results showed that differences in the predicted scores between conditions with answer hints and those without answer hints were observed to be greater in individuals with low self-control traits than in individuals with higher self-control traits, however, such differences between individuals with higher and low self-control traits were only observed in conditions with low social status perception, not in the conditions with high social status perception. The findings indicated that compared with individuals with high self-control, low self-control individuals tended to produce more self-deception. In addition, high social status in the individuals’ perception could restrain the influence of low self-control on self-deception, while low social status in the individuals’ perception could increase the self-control’s influence on self-deception.
机译:这项研究的目的是探讨自我控制和社会地位对自我欺骗的影响。本研究采用前瞻性范式来研究自我控制和社会地位如何影响自我欺骗。在实验1中,要求参与者在预测并完成40个问题(常识性判断材料)之后,完成10个问题,无论有无提示提示。结果表明,与没有答案提示的情况相比,在有答案提示的情况下参与者的预测分数更高,并且在有答案提示的条件下参与者的预测分数远高于实际分数。在实验2中,选择具有不同自我控制特质的个体进行社交状态感知的操作和诱导,然后完成诸如实验1的测试。结果表明,带有答案提示的条件与那些具有提示提示的条件之间的预测得分存在差异自我控制特质低的人比没有自我控制特质的人更大,但是,只有在社会地位知觉低的情况下才能观察到自我控制特质高和低的个体之间的差异。 ,而不是在具有较高社会地位感的条件下。研究结果表明,与自我控制能力强的人相比,自我控制能力低的人倾向于产生更多的自我欺骗。另外,个人感知中较高的社会地位可以抑制自我控制能力低下对自我欺骗的影响,而个人感知内较低的社会地位可以增强自我控制能力对自我欺骗的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号