...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >E-Health Interventions for Adult and Aging Population With Intellectual Disability: A Review
【24h】

E-Health Interventions for Adult and Aging Population With Intellectual Disability: A Review

机译:针对成人和智障老人的电子医疗干预:回顾

获取原文
           

摘要

To answer the question about which e-health and e-therapy applications are being used with people with intellectual disabilities, we searched the PsycINFO, Medline, PubMed, ERIC, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. This is an extensive search. Inclusion criteria were academic journals and any design type that addressed the topic of interest. Studies that do not include adults or elderly, and studies that do not focus on people with disabilities but on third parties, were excluded. After an initial selection of 515 articles, 32 full-text articles were subjected to in-depth analysis leading to the final selection of 18 articles. We used the AAID framework definition of intellectual disability to analyze the dimensions explored by the selected studies and found that the majority of studies focused on the use of technology as supports to instrumental activities of daily life. The ISO classification of assistive products allowed us to identify that many e-health products are aimed at providing psychological or medical treatment. In summary, this review suggests that there is a very small number of studies focusing on the use of technology by older persons with intellectual disabilities. The studies present substantial limitations regarding generalization and replication and pay little attention to the maintenance of cognitive abilities in this population. These aspects, together with premature aging generally associated with many conditions that lead to intellectual disability, underscore the need to pay more attention to and develop e-health interventions for cognitive stimulation for this group.
机译:为了回答有关智障人士正在使用哪些电子保健和电子治疗应用程序的问题,我们搜索了PsycINFO,Medline,PubMed,ERIC,CINAHL,Scopus,Web of Science和Cochrane数据库。这是一个广泛的搜索。入选标准是学术期刊和涉及感兴趣主题的任何设计类型。不包括成人或老人的研究以及不针对残疾人而针对第三方的研究被排除在外。在初步选择515篇文章之后,对32篇全文文章进行了深入分析,最终选择了18篇文章。我们使用了AAID智力障碍的框架定义来分析所选研究探索的范围,发现大多数研究集中于使用技术作为日常生活工具活动的支持。 ISO辅助产品的分类使我们能够确定许多电子保健产品旨在提供心理或医学治疗。总而言之,这项审查表明,很少有研究针对智障老年人使用技术。这些研究对泛化和复制提出了实质性的限制,并且很少关注该人群的认知能力的维持。这些方面以及过早的衰老通常与导致智力残疾的许多状况相关,这凸显了需要更加关注和开发针对该组认知刺激的电子医疗干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号