首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Book Review: Self and Social Identity in Educational Contexts
【24h】

Book Review: Self and Social Identity in Educational Contexts

机译:书评:教育背景下的自我和社会认同

获取原文
           

摘要

The “self” and “social identity” are two core principles that have long fascinated psychologists and sociologists. This broad list of interested academics, researchers, and practitioners ranges from Jung, who aimed to understand the “self” through the interpretation of the unconscious and symbolism (Jung and Shamdasani, 2010), to Tajfel and Turner (1979), who proposed that an individual's perception of who they are is heavily influenced by their membership(s) of a group (or groups). Tajfel and Turner (1986) suggest that, because there are key differences between an individual's personal and social identity, the differences are determined by perceived experiences within interpersonal and group situations. While some theorists have recognized that social identity theory can be limited in its differentiation of groups (Turner et al., 1987; Brown, 2000), other academics across the social sciences have attested to the use of social identity theory in generating hypotheses for the study of group behavior (Huddy, 2001; Bradford, 2014; Jenkins, 2014). While the above is, undoubtedly, a non-exhaustive list of those currently working within the area of “self” and “social identity,” Mavor, Platow, and Bizumic's book “Self and Social Identity in Educational Contexts” (2017) utilizes social identity theory (Tajfel and Turner, 1979) combined with self-categorization (Turner et al., 1987), referred throughout as the “social identity approach,” to highlight the importance of developing “new and creative forms of practice in educational settings” (p. i). In addition to the wealth of knowledge and experience of 44 academics, researchers, and practitioners, this book is viewed as an invitation for others to explore the “social and psychological processes by which learners' personal and social self-concepts shape and enhance learning and teaching” (p. i).
机译:“自我”和“社会身份”是心理学家和社会学家长期着迷的两个核心原则。众多感兴趣的学者,研究人员和从业人员不等,从荣格(Jung and Shamdasani,2010)试图通过理解无意识和象征主义来理解“自我”,再到塔吉菲尔和特纳(Tajfel and Turner,1979)提出。个人对自己的身份的看法在很大程度上受到一个或多个组成员的影响。 Tajfel和Turner(1986)认为,由于个人的个人和社会身份之间存在关键差异,因此差异是由在人际和群体情况下的感知经验决定的。尽管一些理论家已经认识到,社会认同理论在其群体分化方面可能受到限制(Turner等人,1987; Brown,2000),但整个社会科学领域的其他学者都证明了社会认同理论在为社会认同理论生成假设方面的应用。群体行为研究(Huddy,2001; Bradford,2014; Jenkins,2014)。毫无疑问,以上是目前在“自我”和“社会认同”领域工作的人的详尽列表,Mavor,Platow和Bizumic的书“教育环境中的自我和社会认同”(2017)利用了社会认同理论(Tajfel和Turner,1979)与自我归类(Turner等,1987)相结合,通称为“社会认同方法”,以强调发展“在教育环境中实践的新形式和创新形式”的重要性。 (第i页)。除了44位学者,研究人员和从业人员的丰富知识和经验外,本书还被视为邀请其他人探索“学习者的个人和社会自我概念塑造并增强学习和学习的社会和心理过程”。教学”(第i页)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号