首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Is thinking really aversive? A commentary on Wilson et al.'s a??Just think: the challenges of the disengaged minda??
【24h】

Is thinking really aversive? A commentary on Wilson et al.'s a??Just think: the challenges of the disengaged minda??

机译:思考真的令人反感吗?评论威尔逊(Wilson)等人的著作“只需思考:思维分离的挑战”。

获取原文
           

摘要

Spontaneous thought, often colloquially referred to as “daydreaming” or “mind-wandering,” is increasingly being investigated by scientists (for recent reviews, see Christoff, 2012; Andrews-Hanna et al., 2014; Smallwood and Schooler, 2014). In a recent article published in Science, Wilson et al. (2014) argue in support of the view (e.g., Killingsworth and Gilbert, 2010) that such thinking is predominantly unpleasant, and even emotionally aversive. While we were impressed with the enormous wealth of data collected by Wilson et al. and by the number of experimental manipulations carried out, we found their interpretations surprising in light of prior research. We applaud Wilson et al.'s detailed effort to investigate the content and affective qualities of “just thinking”—but upon examining their dataset, we find little support for their claims.
机译:自发性思想(通常被俗称为“白日梦”或“思想游荡”)正被越来越多的科学家研究(有关最近的评论,请参见Christoff,2012; Andrews-Hanna等,2014; Smallwood和Schooler,2014)。在《科学》杂志最近发表的一篇文章中,Wilson等人。 (2014年)为支持该观点(例如Killingsworth和Gilbert,2010年)而辩护,认为这种思想主要是令人不快的,甚至在情感上令人厌恶。威尔逊等人收集的大量数据给我们留下了深刻的印象。并且通过进行的实验操作的数量,我们发现,根据先前的研究,它们的解释令人惊讶。我们赞扬Wilson等人为调查“公正思考”的内容和情感品质所做的详细努力,但在检查他们的数据集时,我们发现他们的主张很少得到支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号