...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law
【24h】

Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law

机译:增强的反馈影响上肢到达运动时间,但不能解释违反菲茨定律的情况

获取原文
           

摘要

Fitts' (1954) classic theorem asserts that the movement time (MT) of voluntary reaches is determined by amplitude and width requirements (i.e., index of difficulty: ID). Actions associated with equivalent IDs should elicit equivalent MTs regardless of the amplitude and/ or width requirements. However, contemporary research has reported that amplitude-based contributions to IDs yield larger increases in MTs than width-based contributions. This discrepancy may relate to the presence of augmented terminal feedback in Fitts' original research, which has not been provided in more recent investigations (e.g., Heath et al., 2011). To address this issue, participants performed reaching movements during two sessions wherein feedback regarding terminal accuracy was either provided or withheld. It was hypothesized that the absence of augmented terminal feedback would result in a stereotyped performance across target widths and explain the violation of Fitts' theorem. Yet, the results revealed distinct influences of amplitude- and width-based manipulations on MT, which also persisted across feedback conditions. This finding supports the assertion that the unitary nature of Fitts' theorem does not account for a continuous range of movement amplitudes and target widths. A secondary analysis was competed in an attempt to further investigate the violation of Fitts' Law. Based on error rates, participants were segregated into accuracy- and speed-prone groups. Additionally, target's IDs were recalculated based on each participant's performance using the effective target width (i.e., IDWe) instead of the nominal target width. When using MT data from the accuracy-prone group with this IDWe, the aforementioned violation was alleviated. Overall, augmented terminal feedback did not explain the violation of Fitts' theorem, although one should consider using the effective target width and participant's strategy in future investigations.
机译:Fitts(1954)的经典定理断言,自愿到达的移动时间(MT)由幅度和宽度要求(即难度指数:ID)确定。不管幅度和/或宽度要求如何,与等效ID相关联的动作都应引起等效MT。但是,当代研究报告说,基于幅度的ID贡献比基于宽度的贡献导致MT的增加幅度更大。这种差异可能与Fitts的原始研究中存在增强的终端反馈有关,但最近的研究并未对此提供补充(例如Heath等,2011)。为了解决这个问题,参与者在两个会话期间进行了到达动作,其中提供或保留了有关终端准确性的反馈。假设没有增强的终端反馈会导致跨目标宽度的定型性能,并解释了违反Fitts定理的情况。然而,结果表明基于幅度和宽度的操作对MT有明显的影响,该影响在反馈条件下也持续存在。这一发现支持了这样的主张,即菲茨定理的单一性质不能说明运动幅度和目标宽度的连续范围。进行了次要分析,以试图进一步调查违反菲茨法的行为。根据错误率,将参与者分为容易准确性和易速度的组。此外,使用有效目标宽度(即IDWe)而不是名义目标宽度,根据每个参与者的表现重新计算目标ID。当将具有准确性的组中的MT数据与该IDWe一起使用时,可以缓解上述违规情况。总体而言,增强的终端反馈并不能解释违反Fitts定理的问题,尽管在未来的调查中应考虑使用有效的目标宽度和参与者的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号