首页> 外文期刊>E3S Web of Conferences >Comparison of Flavonoids from Spina Gleditsiae by Response Surface Method and Orthogonal Design
【24h】

Comparison of Flavonoids from Spina Gleditsiae by Response Surface Method and Orthogonal Design

机译:响应面法与正交试验法比较皂角总黄酮的含量

获取原文
           

摘要

In this paper, the effects of extraction temperature, extraction pressure and dosage of entrainer on flavonoids yield were studied. The optimal process determined by response surface method was extraction temperature as 48.52°, extraction pressure as 40MPa, dosage of entrainer as 36.13mL, theoretical predictive yield as 0.791%, actual verified yield as 0.793%, and there was an interaction between the extraction temperature and dosage of entrainer. The optimum process determined by orthogonal design was extraction temperature as 50°, extraction pressure as 40MPa, dosage of entrainer as 37.5mL, and actual verified yield as 0.779%. Although the two methods obtained similar best processes, the response surface method could provide more accurate information, and the final flavonoids yield was also highest, which was worth promoting.
机译:本文研究了提取温度,提取压力和夹带剂用量对黄酮得率的影响。响应面法确定的最佳工艺为:萃取温度为48.52°,萃取压力为40MPa,夹带剂的用量为36.13mL,理论预测收率为0.791%,实际验证收率为0.793%,且萃取温度之间存在相互作用。和夹带剂的剂量。正交试验确定的最佳工艺为:萃取温度为50°,萃取压力为40MPa,夹带剂用量为37.5mL,实际验证产率为0.779%。尽管这两种方法获得了相似的最佳工艺,但是响应面法可以提供更准确的信息,最终的类黄酮产率也最高,值得推广。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号