...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >An evidence-based recommendation on bed head elevation for mechanically ventilated patients
【24h】

An evidence-based recommendation on bed head elevation for mechanically ventilated patients

机译:机械通气患者床头抬高的循证建议

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionA semi-upright position in ventilated patients is recommended to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and is one of the components in the Ventilator Bundle of the Institute for Health Care Improvement. This recommendation, however, is not an evidence-based one.MethodsA systematic review on the benefits and disadvantages of semi-upright position in ventilated patients was done according to PRISMA guidelines. Then a European expert panel developed a recommendation based on the results of the systematic review and considerations beyond the scientific evidence in a three-round electronic Delphi procedure.ResultsThree trials (337 patients) were included in the review. The results showed that it was uncertain whether a 45° bed head elevation was effective or harmful with regard to the occurrence of clinically suspected VAP, microbiologically confirmed VAP, decubitus and mortality, and that it was unknown whether 45° elevation for 24 hours a day increased the risk for thromboembolism or hemodynamic instability. A group of 22 experts recommended elevating the head of the bed of mechanically ventilated patients to a 20 to 45° position and preferably to a ≥30° position as long as it does not pose risks or conflicts with other nursing tasks, medical interventions or patients' wishes.ConclusionsAlthough the review failed to prove clinical benefits of bed head elevation, experts prefer this position in ventilated patients. They made clear that the position of a ventilated patient in bed depended on many determinants. Therefore, given the scientific uncertainty about the benefits and harms of a semi-upright position, this position could only be recommended as the preferred position with the necessary restrictions.
机译:简介建议在通气患者中半竖立姿势以防止呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP),并且是卫生保健改善研究所呼吸机套件中的组件之一。但是,该建议并非基于证据。方法根据PRISMA指南,对通气患者半直立姿势的利弊进行了系统评价。然后,一个欧洲专家小组根据系统评价的结果以及三轮电子Delphi程序中超出科学依据的考虑因素提出了一项建议。结果包括三项试验(337例患者)。结果表明,对于临床怀疑的VAP发生,微生物学确诊的VAP,褥疮和死亡率,不确定45°床头抬高是有效还是有害,还不清楚每天24小时是否抬高45°增加了血栓栓塞或血液动力学不稳定的风险。由22位专家组成的小组建议将机械通气患者的床头抬高至20至45°的位置,最好升高至≥30°的位置,只要它不会与其他护理任务,医疗干预措施或患者构成风险或冲突结论。尽管该评价未能证明床头抬高的临床益处,但专家更喜欢在通气患者中使用该姿势。他们明确指出,通气患者躺在床上的位置取决于许多决定因素。因此,鉴于有关半直立姿势的利弊的科学不确定性,该姿势只能在有必要限制的情况下建议作为首选姿势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号