...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Chemistry: Journal of the American Association for Clinical Chemists >An inter- and intralaboratory quality-control survey of radioimmunoassay of insulin, thyroxin, thyrotropin, cortisol, digoxin, gastrin, beta 2-microglobulin, and IgE in Japan with commercially available kits.
【24h】

An inter- and intralaboratory quality-control survey of radioimmunoassay of insulin, thyroxin, thyrotropin, cortisol, digoxin, gastrin, beta 2-microglobulin, and IgE in Japan with commercially available kits.

机译:使用市售试剂盒对日本的胰岛素,甲状腺素,促甲状腺素,皮质醇,地高辛,胃泌素,β2-微球蛋白和IgE进行放射免疫测定的实验室间和实验室内质量控制调查。

获取原文
           

摘要

We report results of a quality-control survey of radioimmunoassay (RIA) of eight analytes, participated in by 249 laboratories of various types throughout Japan. For the purpose of the external control survey, lyophilized specimens containing two different concentrations of each analyte were sent to the participating laboratories, which supplied both their assay values and their raw data for the standard curves and for the samples. The individual data for the standard curve were analyzed by the RIA data-processing program described by Faden and Rodbard. The precision profile obtained for the individual assay was used as the estimate of the quality of each assay. Although there was a wide scatter in assay values, the quality of the assay by the individual laboratories was not the major contributor to this scattering, because the values they reported for the assays and precision profiles of the standard curves were almost identical with those obtained from the kit manufacturers. When the reported assay values were analyzed according to the brand of kits, by analysis of variance, the treatment mean square due to difference in the make of the kits significantly exceeded the error mean square due to "within-kit" variation in the assay of insulin, thyroxin, thyrotropin, cortisol, gastrin, and digoxin. The CVs for "between-kit," "within-kit," "between-assay" and "within-assay" variations (the latter two aspects were studied in a representative laboratory, for convenience of comparison) were about 20, 15, 13, and 7%, respectively. Because the observed within-kit variation is of almost the same magnitude as that expected from the combination of within-assay and between-assay variation, the skill of the users probably was equal and the accuracy and precision of the kits probably had the greatest impact on assay variation. This survey also emphasizes the criteria for commercially available RIA kits.
机译:我们报告了对8种分析物进行放射免疫分析(RIA)的质量控制调查的结果,该分析由日本249个各种类型的实验室参与。出于外部对照调查的目的,将包含两种不同浓度的每种分析物的冻干样品发送到参与的实验室,由实验室提供标准曲线和样品的测定值和原始数据。标准曲线的各个数据通过Faden和Rodbard描述的RIA数据处理程序进行分析。为单个测定获得的精密度曲线用作每个测定质量的估计。尽管分析值的分散程度很大,但是各个实验室的分析质量并不是造成这种散射的主要因素,因为他们报告的分析值和标准曲线的精密度与从套件制造商。当根据试剂盒品牌分析报告的测定值时,通过方差分析,由于试剂盒品牌差异而导致的治疗均方差大大超过了由于测定中“试剂盒内”变化而引起的误差均方差。胰岛素,甲状腺素,促甲状腺素,皮质醇,胃泌素和地高辛。 “试剂盒间”,“试剂盒内”,“测定间”和“测定内”变体(为便于比较,在代表性实验室中研究了后两个方面)的CV分别约为20、15, 13和7%。由于观察到的试剂盒内变异与测定内变异和测定间变异的组合所预期的幅度几乎相同,因此用户的技能可能相等,并且试剂盒的准确性和精密度可能产生最大的影响分析变异。这项调查还强调了市售RIA套件的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号