...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >A newer and broader definition of burnout: Validation of the
【24h】

A newer and broader definition of burnout: Validation of the

机译:倦怠的新定义和更广泛定义:

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Burnout syndrome has been clinically characterised by a series of three subtypes: frenetic, underchallenged and worn-out, with reference to coping strategies for stress and frustration at work with different degrees of dedication. The aims of the study are to present an operating definition of these subtypes in order to assess their reliability and convergent validity with respect to a standard burnout criterion and to examine differences with regard to sex and the temporary nature of work contracts. Method An exploratory factor analysis was performed by the main component method on a range of items devised by experts. The sample was composed of 409 employees of the University of Zaragoza, Spain. The reliability of the scales was assessed with Cronbach's α, convergent validity in relation to the Maslach Burnout Inventory with Pearson's r, and differences with Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Results The factorial validity and reliability of the scales were good. The subtypes presented relations of differing degrees with the criterion dimensions, which were greater when dedication to work was lower. The frenetic profile presented fewer relations with the criterion dimensions while the worn-out profile presented relations of the greatest magnitude. Sex was not influential in establishing differences. However, the temporary nature of work contracts was found to have an effect: temporary employees exhibited higher scores in the frenetic profile (p p = 0.018) and worn-out (p Conclusions The classical Maslach description of burnout does not include the frenetic profile; therefore, these patients are not recognised. The developed questionnaire may be a useful tool for the design and appraisal of specific preventive and treatment approaches based on the type of burnout experienced.
机译:背景倦怠综合症的临床特征是一系列三个亚型:狂躁,挑战不足和疲倦,并参考了不同程度的奉献精神应对工作中的压力和沮丧的策略。该研究的目的是提出这些亚型的操作定义,以评估其相对于标准倦怠标准的可靠性和收敛性,并检查性别和工作合同的临时性方面的差异。方法采用主成分法对专家设计的一系列项目进行探索性因素分析。样本由西班牙萨拉戈萨大学的409名员工组成。量表的信度通过Cronbach'sα,相对于Maslach倦怠量表与Pearson's的收敛效度以及Student's t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验的差异进行评估。结果量表的因子有效性和信度良好。这些子类型与标准维度之间存在不同程度的关系,而对工作的投入较低时,它们之间的关系就更大。狂躁的轮廓与标准尺寸之间的关系较少,而磨损的轮廓与标准尺寸之间的关系最大。性别对建立差异没有影响。但是,发现工作合同的临时性质会产生影响:临时员工的狂躁状况(pp = 0.018)和疲倦(p结论)得分较高。结论对疲劳的经典Maslach描述不包括狂躁状况;因此,这些调查表可能是有用的工具,可以根据经历的倦怠类型设计和评估特定的预防和治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号