...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community
【24h】

The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community

机译:三种自我报告筛查工具的心理测量特性,用于识别社区中脆弱的老年人

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Frailty is highly prevalent in older people. Its serious adverse consequences, such as disability, are considered to be a public health problem. Therefore, disability prevention in community-dwelling frail older people is considered to be a priority for research and clinical practice in geriatric care. With regard to disability prevention, valid screening instruments are needed to identify frail older people in time. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the psychometric properties of three screening instruments: the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) and the Sherbrooke Postal Questionnaire (SPQ). For validation purposes the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS) was added. Methods A questionnaire was sent to 687 community-dwelling older people (≥ 70 years). Agreement between instruments, internal consistency, and construct validity of instruments were evaluated and compared. Results The response rate was 77%. Prevalence estimates of frailty ranged from 40% to 59%. The highest agreement was found between the GFI and the TFI (Cohen's kappa = 0.74). Cronbach's alpha for the GFI, the TFI and the SPQ was 0.73, 0.79 and 0.26, respectively. Scores on the three instruments correlated significantly with each other (GFI - TFI, r = 0.87; GFI - SPQ, r = 0.47; TFI - SPQ, r = 0.42) and with the GARS (GFI - GARS, r = 0.57; TFI - GARS, r = 0.61; SPQ - GARS, r = 0.46). The GFI and the TFI scores were, as expected, significantly related to age, sex, education and income. Conclusions The GFI and the TFI showed high internal consistency and construct validity in contrast to the SPQ. Based on these findings it is not yet possible to conclude whether the GFI or the TFI should be preferred; data on the predictive values of both instruments are needed. The SPQ seems less appropriate for postal screening of frailty among community-dwelling older people.
机译:背景脆弱在老年人中非常普遍。其严重的不利后果,例如残疾,被认为是公共卫生问题。因此,在老年人中,社区居民的残疾预防被认为是老年医学研究和临床实践的重点。关于残疾预防,需要有效的筛查工具来及时识别体弱的老年人。这项研究的目的是评估和比较三种筛查工具的心理测量特性:格罗宁根脆弱指标(GFI),蒂尔堡脆弱指标(TFI)和舍布鲁克邮政问卷(SPQ)。为了进行验证,添加了格罗宁根活动限制量表(GARS)。方法向687名社区居民(≥70岁)发送问卷。评估和比较了工具之间的一致性,内部一致性和工具的构造有效性。结果回应率为77%。脆弱的患病率估计为40%至59%。在GFI和TFI之间达成了最高协议(Cohen的kappa = 0.74)。 Cronbach对于GFI,TFI和SPQ的alpha分别为0.73、0.79和0.26。三种工具的得分之间存在显着相关性(GFI-TFI,r = 0.87; GFI-SPQ,r = 0.47; TFI-SPQ,r = 0.42)和GARS(GFI-GARS,r = 0.57; TFI- GARS,r = 0.61; SPQ-GARS,r = 0.46)。正如预期的那样,GFI和TFI分数与年龄,性别,教育程度和收入显着相关。结论与SPQ相比,GFI和TFI具有较高的内部一致性和构建效度。基于这些发现,尚无法得出结论,应优先选择GFI还是TFI。需要有关这两种工具的预测值的数据。对于在社区居住的老年人中进行身体虚弱的邮政筛查,SPQ似乎不太合适。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号