首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Systematic review of mental health and well-being outcomes following community-based obesity prevention interventions among adolescents
【24h】

Systematic review of mental health and well-being outcomes following community-based obesity prevention interventions among adolescents

机译:对青少年进行社区性肥胖预防干预后对心理健康和福祉结果的系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives This paper aimed to systematically evaluate the mental health and well-being outcomes observed in previous community-based obesity prevention interventions in adolescent populations. Setting Systematic review of literature from database inception to October 2014. Articles were sourced from CINAHL, Global Health, Health Source: Nursing and Academic Edition, MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES and PsycINFO, all of which were accessed through EBSCOhost. The Cochrane Database was also searched to identify all eligible articles. PRISMA guidelines were followed and search terms and search strategy ensured all possible studies were identified for review. Participants Intervention studies were eligible for inclusion if they were: focused on overweight or obesity prevention, community-based, targeted adolescents (aged 10–19?years), reported a mental health or well-being measure, and included a comparison or control group. Studies that focused on specific adolescent groups or were treatment interventions were excluded from review. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcomes were measures of mental health and well-being, including diagnostic and symptomatic measures. Secondary outcomes included adiposity or weight-related measures. Results Seven studies met the inclusion criteria; one reported anxiety/depressive outcomes, two reported on self-perception well-being measures such as self-esteem and self-efficacy, and four studies reported outcomes of quality of life. Positive mental health outcomes demonstrated that following obesity prevention, interventions included a decrease in anxiety and improved health-related quality of life. Quality of evidence was graded as very low. Conclusions Although positive outcomes for mental health and well-being do exist, controlled evaluations of community-based obesity prevention interventions have not often included mental health measures (n=7). It is recommended that future interventions incorporate mental health and well-being measures to identify any potential mechanisms influencing adolescent weight-related outcomes, and equally to ensure interventions are not causing harm to adolescent mental health.
机译:目的本文旨在系统评估以前在青少年中基于社区的肥胖预防干预措施中观察到的心理健康和福祉结果。从数据库开始到2014年10月,对文献进行系统的回顾。文章来自CINAHL,全球卫生,卫生来源:护理和学术版,MEDLINE,PsycARTICLES和PsycINFO,所有这些均可通过EBSCOhost访问。还搜索Cochrane数据库,以识别所有符合条件的文章。遵循PRISMA指南,搜索词和搜索策略可确保所有可能的研究均已确定以供审查。参与者符合以下条件的干预研究符合条件:专注于超重或肥胖预防,以社区为基础的有针对性的青少年(10-19岁),报告了心理健康或福祉措施,并且包括比较或对照组。侧重于特定青少年组或治疗干预的研究被排除在外。证据的质量使用“建议,评估,发展和评估等级”(GRADE)指南进行评估。主要和次要指标首要指标是心理健康和幸福感的指标,包括诊断和症状指标。次要结局包括肥胖或与体重有关的措施。结果7项研究符合纳入标准。一项报告了焦虑/抑郁的结果,两项报告了关于自我感知的幸福感(例如自尊和自我效能感),四项研究报告了生活质量的结果。积极的心理健康结果表明,预防肥胖后,干预措施包括减轻焦虑症和改善与健康相关的生活质量。证据质量被评为非常低。结论尽管确实存在精神健康和福祉方面的积极成果,但基于社区的肥胖预防干预措施的对照评估并不经常包括精神卫生措施(n = 7)。建议将来的干预措施应包括心理健康和福祉措施,以查明影响青少年体重相关结局的任何潜在机制,并同样确保干预措施不会对青少年心理健康造成损害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号