首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >021 PP: DUAL THEORETICAL SYNERGY FRAMEWORK: DEVELOPING AND REFINING A METHOD FOR STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN INTERVENTION DEVELOPMENT
【24h】

021 PP: DUAL THEORETICAL SYNERGY FRAMEWORK: DEVELOPING AND REFINING A METHOD FOR STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN INTERVENTION DEVELOPMENT

机译:021 PP:双重理论协同框架:在干预开发中发展和完善利益相关者参与的方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Stakeholder engagement and patient and public involvement (PPI) is now a key expectation within healthcare policy and in securing research funding and often needs to be evident throughout the research process. While systematic reviews and meta-analyses synthesise the best evidence for the content of behaviour change interventions, engaging stakeholders in a collaborative process of co-production could identify the best ways of implementing interventions. We developed the Dual Theoretical Synergy (DTS) Framework to work with stakeholders via expert events to identify the major systemic and psychosocial barriers and facilitators to implementing interventions in practice. The method uses facilitated group exercises to assess the acceptability of the design, content and proposed delivery mechanisms of an intervention to examine systemic, psychosocial and/or contextual barriers and facilitators to implementation, using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Normalisation Process Theory. Qualitative content analysis is used to record the key recurrent issues and to map similarities and differences in responses by domain to create a matrix of key barriers and facilitators to implementation of the candidate intervention. The matrix and a narrative summary are sent to participants for review and comment and to seek consensus on the interpretation of the data. The benefit of the method is in empowering stakeholders to think through and detail key ways of enhancing implementation of the candidate intervention, using standard theoretical constructs, and to engage in collaborative co-production of an intervention that is more likely to be adopted in the ?¢????real world?¢????.
机译:摘要利益相关者的参与以及患者和公众的参与(PPI)现在已成为医疗保健政策以及确保获得研究资金的关键期望,并且通常需要在整个研究过程中显而易见。尽管系统的评论和荟萃分析综合了行为改变干预措施的最佳证据,但让利益相关者参与协同生产的协同过程可以确定实施干预措施的最佳方式。我们开发了双重理论协同(DTS)框架,旨在通过专家活动与利益相关者合作,以识别在实践中实施干预措施的主要系统性和社会性障碍以及促进者。该方法使用理论领域框架和归一化过程理论,通过简化的小组练习来评估干预措施的设计,内容和拟议的交付机制的可接受性,以检查系统,社会心理和/或情境障碍以及促进实施的因素。定性内容分析用于记录关键的重复性问题,并按域映射响应中的相似性和差异,以创建关键障碍和促进候选干预措施实施的矩阵。矩阵和叙述性摘要将发送给参与者,以进行评论和评论,并就数据解释寻求共识。该方法的好处是使利益相关者能够使用标准的理论构造,仔细思考并详细说明增强候选干预措施实施的关键方法,并参与更可能在干预措施中采用的协作式联合生产。 real现实世界¢。

著录项

  • 来源
    《BMJ Open》 |2017年第2期|共页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 临床医学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号