...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes therapy >Persistence to Treatment with Novel Antidiabetic Drugs (Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors, Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors, and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists) in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide Cohort Study
【24h】

Persistence to Treatment with Novel Antidiabetic Drugs (Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors, Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors, and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists) in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide Cohort Study

机译:在2型糖尿病患者中持续使用新型抗糖尿病药物(二肽基肽酶4抑制剂,钠葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂)进行的全国性队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionAdequate persistence to antidiabetic treatment is highly important to achieve proper glycemic control. In this study we evaluate the persistence to treatment with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in a nationwide cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes. MethodsUsing a central database in Hungary, we analyzed the persistence to the treatment with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors ( n =?59,900), sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors ( n =?26,052), and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists ( n =?17,332) at treatment intensification between 2014 and 2016. We also compared the persistence of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors ( n =?9163) and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors ( n =?1257) in initial therapy to that of metformin ( n =?79,305) or sulfonylureas ( n =?29,057). The rates of persistence to treatment and risk of non-persistence are reported. ResultsThe persistence rates of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists at treatment intensification were 69.6%, 67.8%, and 66.3% at year 1 which decreased to 57.3%, 56.8%, and 52.1% by year 2, respectively. The risk of non-persistence was higher by 6.6% (95% CI 3.6–9.6) for sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and by 8.3% (95% CI 5.0–11.5) for glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists as compared to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Novel oral antidiabetic drugs in fixed versus free add-on combinations with metformin had higher persistence. The persistence to treatment with novel oral antidiabetic drugs in initial therapy was better (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, 59.6% and 47.6%; sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, 61.9% and 47.0%) than that of initial monotherapy with metformin (47.0% and 39.1%) or sulfonylureas (52.4% and 41.8%) at years 1 and 2, respectively. ConclusionAnalysis of persistence of treatment with novel glucose-lowering medications revealed differences between drug classes, favoring dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors vs. sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Persistence data of novel antihyperglycemic agents may be useful for guiding the decision at initiation of antidiabetic treatment. FundingHungarian Diabetes Association. Plain Language SummaryPlain language summary available for this article.
机译:简介充分坚持抗糖尿病治疗对于实现适当的血糖控制非常重要。在这项研究中,我们评估了在全国2型糖尿病患者队列中使用二肽基肽酶4抑制剂,钠葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂治疗的持久性。方法使用匈牙利的一个中央数据库,我们分析了用二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(n =?59,900),钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(n =?26,052)和胰高血糖素样肽-1治疗的持久性受体激动剂(n = 17,332)在2014年至2016年间的强化治疗中。我们还比较了二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(n = 9163)和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(n = 1257)的持续性。初始治疗为二甲双胍(n =?79,305)或磺酰脲类(n =?29,057)。报告了持续治疗的比率和非持续风险。结果二肽基肽酶4抑制剂,钠葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂在治疗强化后的持续率在第一年分别为69.6%,67.8%和66.3%,降至57.3%到第二年分别为56.8%和52.1%。钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂的非持久性风险较高,为6.6%(95%CI 3.6–9.6),而胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的非持久风险较高,为8.3%(95%CI 5.0–11.5)。与二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂相比。与二甲双胍固定和自由组合相结合的新型口服降糖药具有更高的持久性。在初始治疗中使用新型口服降糖药的持久性要好于二甲双胍单药初始治疗(二肽基肽酶4抑制剂,分别为59.6%和47.6%;钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂,分别为61.9%和47.0%)第1年和第2年分别为(47.0%和39.1%)或磺酰脲类(52.4%和41.8%)。结论对新型降糖药物治疗的持久性进行分析后发现,不同药物类别之间存在差异,偏爱二肽基肽酶4抑制剂与钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂。新型抗高血糖药的持久性数据可能有助于指导开始抗糖尿病治疗的决策。资助匈牙利糖尿病协会。普通语言摘要本文提供了普通语言摘要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号