...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Thoracic Disease >Impact of anticancer drugs price cut on physician’s prescription choices on first-line chemotherapy regimens and health expenditure for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China
【24h】

Impact of anticancer drugs price cut on physician’s prescription choices on first-line chemotherapy regimens and health expenditure for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China

机译:抗癌药降价对中国晚期非小细胞肺癌一线化疗方案和医疗费用的医生处方选择的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Increases in insurance coverage and price cut of drugs are two important measures to make health care more accessible and affordable. As far as we know, this was the first study to explore the impact of anticancer drug price cut on health expenses and oncologist’s prescription decisions in China. Methods: The 511 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were recruited from Qilu Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2010. We categorized the patients into five groups based on China’s fifth population census in 2000, including administrative group, workers and services group, peasants group, professionals group and others group. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 16.0), all statistic tests were two-tailed and P value ≤0.05 was considered significant. Results: As for the first-line chemotherapy regimens prescribed during the study, 27.6% patients received vinorelbine + cisplatin (NP), 31.5% and 30.9% patients had gemcitabine + cisplatin (GC) and docetaxel + cisplatin (DC), respectively, while only 4.3% patients received paclitaxel + cisplatin or carboplatin (TP). Before price policy implementation, NP was the most popularly used regimen (44.6%). By contrast, doctors’ prescription choices changed significantly after drug price cut, GC took first place (42.0%). GC became the most expensive regimen (4,431.40 RMB per cycle, about 665.15 dollars per cycle), while NP cost the least (1,974.48 RMB per cycle, about 296.37 dollars per cycle) after price cut. No significant reduction could be seen for both the pharmaceutical spending and total expense per inpatient episode after drug price adjustment. One interesting phenomena was that doctors relied less on patient’s sex, age, histology to make their decisions, by contrast, more on patient’s occupation and health insurance type. And, the total drug cost was closely related to patient occupation and health insurance type. Conclusions: The introduction of anticancer drug price control policy was found to be ineffective on the containment of hospital drug expenditures in one cancer center in China.
机译:背景:增加保险范围和降低药品价格是使医疗保健更容易获得和负担得起的两个重要措施。据我们所知,这是中国第一项探索抗癌药降价对健康费用和肿瘤学家处方决定的影响的研究。方法:从2003年1月1日至2010年12月31日在山东大学齐鲁附属医院招募511例非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者。根据2000年的第五次人口普查,将患者分为五组。包括行政小组,工人和服务小组,农民小组,专业人员小组和其他小组。所有统计分析均使用SPSS(版本16.0)进行,所有统计检验均为双尾检验,P值≤0.05被认为具有显着性。结果:就研究中规定的一线化疗方案而言,分别有27.6%的患者接受了长春瑞滨+顺铂(NP)的治疗,分别有31.5%和30.9%的患者接受了吉西他滨+顺铂(GC)和多西他赛+顺铂(DC)的治疗。仅4.3%的患者接受了紫杉醇+顺铂或卡铂(TP)。在实施价格政策之前,NP是最常用的方案(44.6%)。相比之下,在药品降价之后,医生的处方选择发生了显着变化,GC排名第一(42.0%)。降价后,GC成为最昂贵的方案(每个周期4,431.40元,每个周期约665.15美元),而NP成本最低(每个周期1,974.48元,每个周期约296.37美元)。调整药物价格后,每次住院的药物支出和总费用均未见明显减少。一种有趣的现象是,相比之下,医生较少依赖患者的性别,年龄,组织学来做出决定,而更多地依赖患者的职业和健康保险类型。并且,总药物成本与患者职业和健康保险类型密切相关。结论:在中国一个癌症中心,抗癌药物价格控制政策的实施对控制医院药物支出无效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号