首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Vascular Diagnostics and Interventions >Determination of bilateral symmetry of carotid artery structure and function in children and adolescents
【24h】

Determination of bilateral symmetry of carotid artery structure and function in children and adolescents

机译:儿童和青少年双侧颈动脉结构和功能的对称性测定

获取原文
           

摘要

The carotid artery represents an ideal location for noninvasive assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis in youth. Examination of arterial structure and function is generally conducted in the left common carotid. However, if the left common carotid is inaccessible or provides a poor acoustic window, it is unknown if the right common carotid can provide comparable values. The symmetry of carotid arteries in youth with high-resolution ultrasound was compared. Participants (N=230 [121 females], 13.8±2.9 years old) were assessed for carotid intima media thickness (cIMT), carotid lumen diameter (cLD), carotid incremental elastic modulus (cIEM), carotid diameter compliance (cDC), carotid cross-sectional compliance (cCSC), carotid diameter distensibility (cDD), and carotid cross-sectional distensibility (cCSD). No significant differences ( P >0.05 all) were found for cIMT (0.49±0.09 vs 0.49±0.08?mm), cIEM (1095±382 vs 1116±346 mmHg), cDC (0.01±0.0 vs 0.01±0.0 mm/mmHg), cCSC (0.01±0.001/mmHg vs 0.01±0.001/mmHg), cDD (14.0%±3.16% vs 13.7%±3.18%), and cCSD (30.1%±7.37% vs 29.4%±7.36%). Significant differences were found for cLD (6.06±0.62 mm vs 6.33±0.64 mm, P <0.001). The majority of measures for arterial structure and function are comparable between the left and right common carotid arteries. There were differences present for cLD; however, these discrepancies are likely due to anatomical differences between the left and right common carotid arteries. Therefore, if the left common carotid is unable to be assessed properly, the right common carotid may be a viable alternative measurement location of subclinical atherosclerosis.
机译:颈动脉代表青年无创评估亚临床动脉粥样硬化的理想位置。动脉结构和功能的检查通常在左颈总动脉中进行。但是,如果左颈总动脉无法接近或提供较差的声学窗口,则不清楚右颈总动脉能否提供可比较的数值。用高分辨率超声比较了青年人颈动脉的对称性。评估参与者(N = 230 [121位女性],13.8±2.9岁)的颈动脉内膜中层厚度(cIMT),颈动脉内腔直径(cLD),颈动脉增量弹性模量(cIEM),颈动脉直径顺应性(cDC),颈动脉横截面顺应性(cCSC),颈动脉直径可扩张性(cDD)和颈动脉截面可扩张性(cCSD)。 cIMT(0.49±0.09 vs 0.49±0.08?mm),cIEM(1095±382 vs 1116±346 mmHg),cDC(0.01±0.0 vs 0.01±0.0 mm / mmHg)没有发现显着差异(P> 0.05全部)。 ,cCSC(0.01±0.001 / mmHg对0.01±0.001 / mmHg),cDD(14.0%±3.16%对13.7%±3.18%)和cCSD(30.1%±7.37%对29.4%±7.36%)。发现cLD有显着差异(6.06±0.62 mm对6.33±0.64 mm,P <0.001)。左,右颈总动脉之间的大多数动脉结构和功能测量指标是可比的。 cLD存在差异;但是,这些差异可能是由于左右颈总动脉之间的解剖结构差异所致。因此,如果无法正确评估左颈总动脉,则右颈总动脉可能是亚临床动脉粥样硬化的可行替代测量位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号