...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of urban health >Traveling by Bus Instead of Car on Urban Major Roads: Safety Benefits for Vehicle Occupants, Pedestrians, and Cyclists
【24h】

Traveling by Bus Instead of Car on Urban Major Roads: Safety Benefits for Vehicle Occupants, Pedestrians, and Cyclists

机译:在城市主要道路上乘公共汽车而不是汽车旅行:对车辆乘员,行人和骑自行车者的安全利益

获取原文
           

摘要

Some studies have estimated fatality and injury rates for bus occupants, but data was aggregated at the country level and made no distinction between bus types. Also, injured pedestrians and cyclists, as a result of bus travel, were overlooked. We compared injury rates for car and city bus occupants on specific urban major roads, as well as the cyclist and pedestrian injuries associated with car and bus travel. We selected ten bus routes along major urban arterials (in Montreal, Canada). Passenger-kilometers traveled were estimated from vehicle counts at intersections (2002–2010) and from bus passenger counts (2008). Police accident reports (2001–2010) provided injury data for all modes. Injury rates associated with car and bus travel were calculated for vehicle occupants, pedestrians, and cyclists. Injury rate ratios were also computed. The safety benefits of bus travel, defined as the number of vehicle occupant, cyclist, and pedestrian injuries saved, were estimated for each route. Overall, for all ten routes, the?ratio between car and bus occupant injury rates?is?3.7 (95% CI [3.4, 4.0]). The rates of pedestrian and cyclist injuries per hundred million passenger-kilometers are?also?significantly greater for car travel than that for bus travel: 4.1?(95% CI [3.5, 4.9]) times greater for pedestrian injuries; 5.3 (95% CI [3.8, 7.6]) times greater for cyclist injuries. Similar results were observed for fatally and severely injured vehicle occupants, cyclists, and pedestrians. At the route level, the safety benefits of bus travel increase with the difference in injury rate associated with car and bus travel but also with the amount of passenger-kilometers by bus. Results show that city bus is a safer mode than car, for vehicle occupants but also for cyclists and pedestrians traveling along these bus routes. The safety benefits of bus travel greatly vary across urban routes; this spatial variation is most likely linked to environmental factors. Understanding the safety benefits of public transit for specific transport routes is likely to provide valuable information for mobilizing city and transportation planners.
机译:一些研究估计了公共汽车乘员的死亡率和伤害率,但数据是在国家/地区汇总的,没有区分公共汽车类型。另外,由于公共汽车旅行而受伤的行人和骑自行车者也被忽略了。我们比较了特定城市主要道路上汽车和城市公共汽车乘员的伤害率,以及与汽车和公共汽车旅行相关的骑自行车者和行人的伤害。我们选择了十条沿主要城市干线(加拿大蒙特利尔)的公交路线。根据交叉路口的车辆数量(2002-2010年)和公交车乘客数量(2008年)估算行进的乘客公里数。警察事故报告(2001-2010年)提供了所有模式的伤害数据。计算了乘车人,行人和骑车人与汽车和公共汽车旅行相关的伤害率。还计算了伤害率。估计每条路线的公共汽车旅行的安全性收益,定义为节省的乘员,骑自行车的人和行人受伤的人数。总体而言,对于所有十条路线,汽车和公共汽车乘员的伤害率之比为3.7(95%CI [3.4,4.0])。每亿人行公里的行人和骑自行车者的受伤率也比汽车旅行高出很多:比行人受伤高4.1倍(95%CI [3.5,4.9]);骑自行车者受伤的危险性要大5.3倍(95%CI [3.8,7.6])。对于致命和重伤的车辆乘员,骑自行车的人和行人也观察到了类似的结果。在路线级别上,公交旅行的安全性收益随着与汽车和公交旅行相关的伤害率的不同而增加,而且随着公交乘客的公里数增加而增加。结果表明,城市公交车比汽车更安全,对于乘员来说,对于沿这些公交路线行驶的骑自行车的人和行人来说也是如此。公共汽车旅行的安全利益在城市路线之间存在很大差异;这种空间变化很可能与环境因素有关。了解公共交通对特定交通路线的安全利益,可能会为动员城市和交通规划者提供有价值的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号