...
首页> 外文期刊>JSLS : >Retroperitoneal Approach in Single-Port Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
【24h】

Retroperitoneal Approach in Single-Port Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

机译:单孔腹腔镜子宫切除术的腹膜后入路

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Objectives: In single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy(SP-LH), ligation of the uterine artery is a fundamental step. We analyzed the effectiveness and safety of 2 different surgical approaches to ligate the uterine artery in SP-LH for women with uterine myomas or adenomyosis. Methods: A single surgeon (TJ Kim) performed 36 retroperitoneal single-port laparoscopic hysterectomies (SP-rH) from September 1st 2012 to April 30th 2013. We compared these cases with 36 cases of conventional single-port laparoscopic abdominal hysterectomy (SP-aH) performed by the same surgeon from November 1st 2011 to July 31th 2012 (historic control). In the SP-rH cases, the retroperitoneal space was developed to identify the uterine artery; then, it was ligated where it originates from the internal iliac artery. Results: Estimated blood loss (EBL) was decreased in the SP-rH group compared with the SP-aH group (100 mL vs 200 mL; P = .023). The median total operative time was shorter in the SP-rH group (75 minutes vs 93 minutes; P < .05). The operative time of the Scope I phase, including ligation of the utero-ovarian (or infundibulopelvic) ligament, round ligament, uterine artery, and detachment of the bladder, was longer in the SP-rH group compared with that in the SP-aH group (26.0 minutes vs 24 minutes; P = .043). However, the operative time of the Scope II phase, including detachment of the uterosacral-cardinal ligament, vaginal cutting, and uterus removal, was shorter in the SP-rH group (19.5 minutes vs 30 minutes; P < .05). Operative complications were not significantly different between the groups ( P = .374). Conclusion: Although SP-rH may be considered technically difficult, it can be performed safely and efficiently with surgical outcomes comparable to those of SP-aH.
机译:背景与目的:在单端口腹腔镜子宫切除术(SP-LH)中,结扎子宫动脉是一个基本步骤。我们分析了SP-LH中两种子宫结扎术对子宫肌瘤或子宫腺肌病妇女的有效性和安全性。方法:从2012年9月1日至2013年4月30日,一名外科医生(TJ Kim)进行了36例腹膜后单口腹腔镜子宫切除术(SP-rH)。我们将这些病例与36例常规单口腹腔镜腹腔子宫切除术(SP-aH)进行了比较。 )由同一位外科医生于2011年11月1日至2012年7月31日进行(历史控制)。在SP-rH病例中,腹膜后间隙被用来识别子宫动脉。然后,将其从内动脉起源处结扎。结果:与SP-aH组相比,SP-rH组的估计失血量(EBL)有所降低(100 mL vs 200 mL; P = .023)。 SP-rH组中位总手术时间较短(75分钟比93分钟; P <.05)。与SP-aH组相比,SP-rH组的范围I期手术时间(包括子宫卵巢(或漏斗骨盆)韧带结扎,圆形韧带,子宫动脉和膀胱脱离)的手术时间更长。组(26.0分钟vs 24分钟; P = .043)。但是,SP-rH组的Scope II期手术时间,包括子宫ac骨-韧带分离,阴道切开和子宫切除术的时间较短(19.5分钟对30分钟; P <.05)。两组之间的手术并发症无显着差异(P = .374)。结论:尽管SP-rH在技术上可能被认为是困难的,但是可以安全有效地进行SP-rH,其手术结果与SP-aH相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号