...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Korean Chemical Society >An Comparison Analysis of Science Writing Tasks in the Chemistry Domain of Middle School Science Textbooks Developed under the 2007 & the 2009 Revised National Curriculums (RNC)
【24h】

An Comparison Analysis of Science Writing Tasks in the Chemistry Domain of Middle School Science Textbooks Developed under the 2007 & the 2009 Revised National Curriculums (RNC)

机译:2007年和2009年修订的国家课程(RNC)编写的中学科学课本化学领域中科学写作任务的比较分析

获取原文
           

摘要

In this study, we sampled science writing tasks and investigated their frequency of use shown in the chemistry domain from two sets of 18 middle school science textbooks developed under the 2007 Revised National Curriculum(RNC) and the 2009 RNC, respectively. In addition, we categorized the sampled science writing tasks depending on the cognitive process and type of writing and compared with the results obtained from analysis of global issues presented in the science writings. From the textbooks developed under the 2007 RNC, a total of 183 science writing tasks were identified in which 10.17 tasks per textbook and 1.32 tasks per 10 pages were used averagely. A total of 168 were identified from the textbooks for the 2009 RNC. Among them, 9.33 tasks per textbook and 1.23 tasks per 10 pages were used on average. Comparing with these results, the average frequency of use of the tasks per textbook and per ten pages were decreased, respectively. Moreover, the number of science writing tasks were found in each curriculum varied considerably depending on the units and the publishers, and that the writing tasks were mainly arranged in the finale, wrapping up stage. In the analysis of science writing tasks according to the cognitive process, the highest and lowest frequency of use were observed in the category of ??understand?ˉ and ??remember?ˉ, respectively. According to the classification of science writing tasks based on the types of writing, the writings for the information delivery were most used and the highest frequency of use was observed in the category of ??understand?ˉ of the cognitive process belonging to ??information delivery?ˉ. As for the results of the analysis of global issues, the num2007 °3á¤?¤2009 °3ᤠá??D±3 °ú?D ±3°ú?- è-?D?μ?a?? ????μè °ú?D ±??2±a 1??×à? o?±3 oD?? 601 2014, Vol. 58, No. 6 ber of science writing tasks including global issues increased from 21(11.48%) in the 2007 RNC to 33(19.64%) in the 2009 RNC. Furthermore, science writing tasks associated with protection of environment showed the highest frequency of use in the both curriculums, and it was analyzed that the materials of global issues used in the 2009 RNC were much more diverse.
机译:在这项研究中,我们抽样了科学写作任务,并分别从2007年修订的国家课程(RNC)和2009年的RNC下开发的两套18册中学科学教科书中调查了化学领域中的写作使用频率。此外,我们根据认知过程和写作类型对抽样的科学写作任务进行了分类,并与通过分析科学著作中的全球性问题而获得的结果进行了比较。从2007 RNC开发的教科书中,总共确定了183项科学写作任务,其中平均每本教科书使用10.17个任务,每10页平均使用1.32个任务。从2009 RNC的教科书中总共确定了168个。其中,平均每本教科书使用9.33项任务,每10页平均使用1.23项任务。与这些结果相比,每本教科书和每十页的任务平均使用频率降低了。此外,每个课程中发现的科学写作任务的数量根据单位和出版商的不同而有很大差异,并且写作任务主要安排在结局,总结阶段。在根据认知过程分析科学写作任务时,在“理解”和“记住”类别中分别观察到最高和最低使用频率。根据基于写作类型的科学写作任务的分类,用于信息传递的写作使用最多,在属于“信息”认知过程的“理解”类别中观察到使用频率最高。交货。关于全局问题的分析结果,num2007°3á?¤2009°3á¤á?? D±3°ú?D±3°ú?-è-?D?μ?a? ????μè°ú?D±?? 2±a 1 ??×à? o?±3 oD ?? 601 2014,Vol。 58,包括全球性问题在内的第6项科学写作任务从2007年RNC中的21(11.48%)增加到2009年RNC中的33(19.64%)。此外,与环境保护相关的科学写作任务在两种课程中的使用频率均最高,据分析,2009 RNC中使用的全球性问题的材料更加多样化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号