首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the International Aids Society >Re‐reading of OraQuick HIV‐1/2 rapid antibody test results: quality assurance implications for HIV self‐testing programmes
【24h】

Re‐reading of OraQuick HIV‐1/2 rapid antibody test results: quality assurance implications for HIV self‐testing programmes

机译:重读OraQuick HIV-1 / 2快速抗体检测结果:质量保证对HIV自我检测程序的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Scale‐up of HIV self‐testing (HIVST) will play a key role in meeting the United Nation's 90‐90‐90 targets. Delayed re‐reading of used HIVST devices has been used by early implementation studies to validate the performance of self‐test kits and to estimate HIV positivity among self‐testers. We investigated the stability of results on used devices under controlled conditions to assess its potential as a quality assurance approach for HIVST scale‐up. Methods 444 OraQuicksup?/sup HIV‐1/2 rapid antibody tests were conducted using commercial plasma from two HIV‐positive donors and HIV‐negative plasma (high‐reactive n?=?148, weak‐reactive n?=?148 and non‐reactive n?=?148) and incubated them for six months under four conditions (combinations of high and low temperatures and humidity). Devices were re‐read daily for one week, weekly for one subsequent month and then once a month by independent readers unaware of the previous results. We used multistage transition models to investigate rates of change in device results, and between storage conditions. Results and discussion There was a high incidence of device instability. Forty‐three (29%) of 148 initially non‐reactive results became false weak‐reactive results. These changes were observed across all incubation conditions, the earliest on Day 4 (n?=?9 kits). No initially HIV‐reactive results changed to a non‐reactive result. There were no significant associations between storage conditions and hazard of results transition. We observed substantial statistical agreement between independent re‐readers over time (agreement range: 0.74 to 0.96). Conclusions Delayed re‐reading of used OraQuicksup?/sup HIV‐1/2 rapid antibody tests is not currently a valid methodological approach to quality assurance and monitoring as we observed a high incidence (29%) of true non‐reactive tests changing to false weak‐reactive and therefore its use may overestimate true HIV positivity.
机译:简介扩大艾滋病毒自我检测(HIVST)在实现联合国90-90-90目标方面将发挥关键作用。早期实施研究已经使用了二手HIVST设备的延迟重读来验证自检工具包的性能并估计自检者中的HIV阳性。我们调查了在受控条件下二手设备上结果的稳定性,以评估其作为HIVST扩大规模质量保证方法的潜力。方法使用来自两个HIV阳性供体的商业血浆和HIV阴性血浆(高反应性n?= 148,弱反应性n?)对444种OraQuick ? HIV-1 / 2快速抗体进行了测试。 =?148和非反应性n?=?148),并在四种条件下(高温和低温和湿度的结合)将它们孵育六个月。每天不间断地阅读一次设备,随后每个月重新阅读一次,然后由不了解先前结果的独立读者每月重新阅读一次。我们使用了多阶段过渡模型来调查设备结果以及存储条件之间的变化率。结果与讨论设备不稳定的发生率很高。 148个初始非反应性结果中有43个(29%)变成了虚假的弱反应性结果。最早在第4天(n?=?9试剂盒),就在所有孵育条件下观察到了这些变化。最初没有将HIV反应性结果更改为非反应性结果。存储条件与结果过渡的危险之间没有显着关联。我们观察到随着时间的推移,独立阅读者之间的统计一致性很高(协议范围:0.74至0.96)。结论延迟重新阅读使用过的OraQuick ? HIV-1 / 2快速抗体检测方法目前不是有效的质量保证和监测方法,因为我们观察到真正的非OraQuick ? HIV-1 / 2快速抗体检测率很高(29%)。反应测试变为假的弱反应,因此其使用可能会高估真实的HIV阳性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号