...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the International Aids Society >Suboptimal geographic accessibility to comprehensive HIV care in the US: regional and urban–rural differences
【24h】

Suboptimal geographic accessibility to comprehensive HIV care in the US: regional and urban–rural differences

机译:在美国,获得综合性HIV护理的地域可达性欠佳:地区和城乡差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Achieving US state and municipal benchmarks to end the HIV epidemic and promote health equity requires access to comprehensive HIV care. However, this care may not be geographically accessible for all people living with HIV (PLHIV). We estimated county‐level drive time and suboptimal geographic accessibility to HIV care across the contiguous US, assessing regional and urban–rural differences. We integrated publicly available data from four federal databases to identify and geocode sites providing comprehensive HIV care in 2015, defined as the co‐located provision of core HIV medical care and support services. Leveraging street network, US Census and HIV surveillance data (2014), we used geographic analysis to estimate the fastest one‐way drive time between the population‐weighted county centroid and the nearest site providing HIV care for counties reporting at least five diagnosed HIV cases. We summarized HIV care sites, county‐level drive time, population‐weighted drive time and suboptimal geographic accessibility to HIV care, by US region and county rurality (2013). Geographic accessibility to HIV care was suboptimal if drive time was 30?min, a common threshold for primary care accessibility in the general US population. Tests of statistical significance were not performed, since the analysis is population‐based. We identified 671 HIV care sites across the US, with 95% in urban counties. Nationwide, the median county‐level drive time to HIV care is 69?min (interquartile range (IQR) 66?min). The median county‐level drive time to HIV care for rural counties (90?min, IQR 61) is over twice that of urban counties (40?min, IQR 48), with the greatest urban–rural differences in the West. Nationally, population‐weighted drive time, an approximation of individual‐level drive time, is over five times longer in rural counties than in urban counties. Geographic access to HIV care is suboptimal for over 170,000 people diagnosed with HIV (19%), with over half of these individuals from the South and disproportionately the rural South. Nationally, approximately 80,000 (9%) drive over an hour to receive HIV care. Suboptimal geographic accessibility to HIV care is an important structural barrier in the US, particularly for rural residents living with HIV in the South and West. Targeted policies and interventions to address this challenge should become a priority.
机译:要达到美国的州和市基准以结束艾滋病毒流行并促进健康平等,就需要获得全面的艾滋病毒护理。但是,并非所有艾滋病毒携带者(PLHIV)都能从地理上获得这种护理。我们估算了整个美国连续的县级开车时间和艾滋病护理的次优地理可及性,从而评估了地区和城乡差异。我们整合了来自四个联邦数据库的公开数据,以识别和地理编码提供全面HIV护理的站点,并将其定义为2015年集中提供的核心HIV医疗和支持服务。利用街道网络,美国人口普查和艾滋病毒监测数据(2014年),我们使用地理分析来估计人口加权县质心与最近的站点之间的最快单向行驶时间,该站点为报告至少五例确诊的艾滋病毒病例的县提供艾滋病毒护理。我们按美国地区和县乡村(2013年)总结了艾滋病毒护理地点,县级驱车时间,人口加权驱车时间以及获得艾滋病毒护理的地理条件不佳。如果驾车时间> 30分钟(这是美国一般人群中初级保健可及性的常见阈值),则在地理上无法获得HIV护理的条件将是次优的。由于分析是基于人群的,因此未进行统计显着性检验。我们在全美确定了671个HIV护理站点,其中95%在城市县。在全国范围内,县一级获得HIV护理的平均时间为69分钟(四分位间距(IQR)66分钟)。农村县县级艾滋病毒感染的中位数驱动时间(90分钟,IQR 61)是城市县(40分钟,IQR 48)的两倍多,西部地区的城乡差异最大。在全国范围内,人口加权的行驶时间(近似于个人行驶时间)在农村县比城市县长五倍以上。超过170,000名被诊断为HIV的人(19%)在地理上无法获得HIV护理,其中一半以上的人来自南方,而南部地区则更多。在全国范围内,大约一个小时内有80,000(9%)的人开车去接受HIV护理。在美国,获得艾滋病护理的地理条件欠佳是一个重要的结构性障碍,特别是对于南部和西部感染艾滋病毒的农村居民而言。应对这一挑战的针对性政策和干预措施应成为优先事项。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号