【24h】

Trade Unions in the Comfort Zone: Liberal Authority in Yeltsin’s Russia.

机译:舒适区的工会:俄罗斯叶利钦的自由党。

获取原文
       

摘要

While much has been written on the failure of the Yeltsin presidency and the transformation of Russian society since 1991, little work has been done that illustrates the participation of established liberal democracies in supporting Yeltsin’s authoritarian, politically unresponsive ‘superpresidentialism,’ or linking this support to the authoritarian nature of the modern liberal democratic project itself. By examining Russian trade union culture and history, as well as international trade union representative involvement, this paper argues that the persistent neglect of unions in the 1990s to challenge social relations of production can be understood as paradigmatic of an authoritarian dynamic focused on the political elite rather than on their membership. With international support, the regime’s concern was with the dismantling of Soviet economic relations and social institutions. Working from the culture and history of Russian trade unions, the unions’ efforts to retain a place in the new era through a strategy of ‘social partnership,’ combined with the collapse of the social welfare system, reinforced a top-down inertia characteristic of the unions. The result, predictably, was an era marked by a politics of irresponsibility, a political ethic is not indicative of an inherent Russian authoritarianism, but that of the authoritarian nature of the liberal modernity itself.
机译:尽管自1991年以来叶利钦总统任职失败和俄罗斯社会转型的报道很多,但几乎没有任何工作可以说明已建立的自由民主国家参与支持叶利钦的独裁,对政治反应迟钝的“超级总统主义”,或将这种支持与现代自由民主计划本身的专制性质。通过考察俄罗斯工会的文化和历史,以及国际工会代表的参与,本文认为,1990年代工会对生产社会关系挑战的持续忽视可以被理解为集中于政治精英的专制动力的典范。而不是会员资格。在国际支持下,该政权的关注点在于苏联经济关系和社会机构的解体。从俄罗斯工会的文化和历史出发,工会通过“社会伙伴关系”战略在新时代中保留一席之地的努力,再加上社会福利制度的崩溃,增强了俄罗斯工人自上而下的惯性特征。工会。可以预见的是,结果是一个以不负责任的政治为标志的时代,政治伦理不是俄国固有的威权主义的标志,而是自由现代性本身的威权性质的标志。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号